Wednesday, December 30, 2020

What have we learned about disease?

 



What we have seen is the spread of C19 disease around the globe.  If this were a bad germ communicated similarly, there could be as many as 100M dead by now- like a hydrogen bomb launched in a populated area.  Since most people had minor symptoms, it was possible for C19 to spread around before it was noticed.  As a consequence how it initially spread is in doubt, but it seems to have been vectored through medical supplies probably made in China, as well as by international travelers.  What came from China, did not stay in China, as is usual.  China's social program to control disease, obviously is failed, along with trying to control the use of bubble gum.

Initially, testing was not in place.  To track a disease you would need testing all the time.  You go to the doctor, he takes a sample, and you find out you have X with a probability of Y.  This process currently is not simple, but a little research program every time they encounter a new bug.  New technology here is needed.  It is very bad to have tests that take too long for a result, or that give too many false positives.  You could get very sick before you knew it was C19.  Also there was always a fairly high probability (40%) that you didn't have C19 but the test was returned positive.

Logistically, how did authorities handle this?  Very poorly.  People pretended to have crowded hospitals,  mayors refused emergency measures - placing patients into nursing homes- and now they are placing nursing home patients into hospitals. The goal early on, was to create the lockdown condition for some, which was successful, actually a surprise to them.  Later they tried to implement a plan to contact trace, which was a fiasco.  People believed external control was basically to implement  a plan to control disease, so they complied.  If they had known they were being manipulated, no doubt it would have been different.  They rebelled- went out of lockdown saying it was unconstitutional to restrain their movements.  They did not comply with contact tracers.  Most were unaffected really by C19 despite their liberty.  The idea evolved, which seemed quite intelligent, that a more sensible program would be to isolate candidates that would have higher risk of death.  Something would be needed: outer shell, screening and sterilization, then entry.  There was nothing like this.  No PPE was sterilized that I know of.  There was no domestic production of PPE.  They savagely blocked visitors, but medical staff were allowed to come and go.

Similarly, the general populace were locked down, and workers/grocery shoppers were allowed to move around at will.  If tested positive, they were placed into isolation.  This setup seemed to guarantee everyone would be exposed sooner or later as the disease dispersed.  This is okay in China, to cull the herd as it were, but in the US this is very poor policy.  The lockdown was an inherited idea, that had not been rethought.

Finally vaccines were rapidly developed.  But many are wary of getting one for protection because of side effects, and people dying from anaphylactic shock.  Elders, it was designed to assist were told the reaction might kill them.  Generally it was said the vaccine did not stop the transmission of the disease, and distancing would still be required.  So, the vaccines may provide some peace of mind at work and shopping, but then this group is less likely to have serious consequences from the virus.  In other words they might work out the legal ramifications of vaccines this way, but like with the cold- a real vaccination doesn't really exist that is useful.

TO stop a viral outbreak like this, you have to be vaccinated beforehand so it is not transmitted.  This is hard to do, since nations like China have poor social control, and are secretive.  So as a country, testing to ID viruses and their early containment would seem to be the answer.  Tracing the virus back to its source, is necessary, and the cessation of all travel and goods from there is required.  Clearly, you re better prepositioned for outbreaks elsewhere, by self-production of products by people who are not infected.

Rapid response is needed at first, so a state of national emergency is needed with high compliance.  Response to a lethal disease outbreak is not democratic.  If the disease were very dangerous any deviation from emergency plans would be quite damaging. We saw areas of large population acting autonomously, and detrimentally.

Monday, December 28, 2020

Social Mandate: Vaccination Action


 


Should you be forced to take a vaccination?

IT might seem controversial, yet some people have no problem saying you just have to take it.  Alan Dershowitz said you have no right to refuse a vaccination shot.  the Equal opportunity Employment Commission said it doesn't violate access to employment for any group therefore an employer could mandate a vaccination prior to letting you into the workforce.

What does taking a vaccination have to do with EOEC?  Using their logic they could make the entire workforce do anything as long as it is across the board.  People should not have to take a vaccination in order to live, because - for one thing- they might die.  It would be immoral to force them to do that.  there are other ways to do this, for example, have them take the quick Covid test, or have them examined to see if they are symptomatic.  This ought to be acceptable since they have not rigorously tested the vaccine, and this approach is not modern anymore- not specialized by sex, age, race, or other attribute such as sensitivity.  I use the word modern, as I have used it all my life- not referring to an era we are supposed to think is over, but rather updated, or up to date.

Saturday, December 26, 2020

 


Mayor Cooper of Nashville, may have acquiesced to the bombing of the AT&T building.  Individuals are afraid, since the perception exists the federal government may not respond.   IT may have severed links used by Oakridge National Lab (ORNL), as part of an ongoing cyber attack.  ORNL does research into cybersecurity, and uses for nuclear reactions.  China has repeatedly tried to attack the lab since 2007.  Chinese actually applied to work at ORNL(one a graduate of the UW-Madison) , to learn more about proton focusing among other things.  Someone in the media finally said: "Hey, should we be allowing these people to work in our labs?" Iran might also be an actor in this, as a reprisal for the murder of one of their researchers by Israel.  

The border issue is important.  We do not have the resources to chase down groups operating within our country.  There are several concerns, none of which is being addressed: Without travel restrictions there are problems with the spread of disease.  Obviously the idea of leaving everything open was a severe failure.  Secondly there are the uncontained attacks via communication channels that need to be more closely monitored, and shut off to hostile states.  Thirdly, we have agents operating within the country, that may do any amount of damage to us, if they are not intercepted first.  This is very difficult to control with open borders.  WE cannot allow foreign entities to assault us at will if they so choose. Why are our votes being counted outside the country?

How can you stop a terror incident when you have no border control?  If a country like Iran threatens, what response was there?  Maybe listening in on a few telephone lines?

Wednesday, December 23, 2020

Cheap classes!


 

Everyone is online, attending class over the internet these days.  The question is, suppose someone who interests you has a semester class.  Can you enroll across boundaries of these institutions to get less expensive or more interesting classes, for credit back where you are enrolled?  

To the enduser, Zoom doesn't care where you are, whether it is New York City, or China, although there may be latencies or blocks across some nations.  So say you would like the chance to hear Marilynne Robinson give a series of lectures from the Univ. of Iowa on writing and her books, comparing them with literature that is similar.  Why not get credit?

There are many cases in which classes are not available locally or only available every other year and you need to take it now.  What to do?  If the famous Prof. Swartfinger is offering his class this upcoming semsester, Why can't you take it?  You might find you cannot attend a particular school because they do not offer you all the classes you would like to have, or that you might have to waste a year waiting for a class to be taught.

And what if the professor teaching your class dislikes teaching and he just rips through the material spiritlessly.  For Godsake, why can't I take this class from somewhere else?


P TRump will speak to his citizens

 


The wave of corruption started in 2006 or so, will gradually play itself out.  But for the moment it is still here among us, and affecting our lives.

P. Trump is expected to show in graphic detail, undeniable proof of fraud in the election overlooked by Justice Roberts.  Much of the fraud  was motivated by P. Obama.  There will be no hope for Biden when people see and know what actually happened.

IF evidence is clearly displayed, that depicts step by step what happened with the voting machines, should fail, and a goony gets in as the corrupt champion president, expect turmoil.  I believe the vast majority elected P. Trump, and they will not support Biden.  Biden has the Chinese as his main supporters and I think the moves made by China ought to call for a suppression of their expansion.  If Biden exhorts them to expand faster, I would expect he would have a fairly serious confrontation on his hands since China is a dangerous, expansionary power.  The rise of the radical Left during his term may dislodge him from office.  This would leave a Latino band in charge, with Muslims, and Africans as the remaining party.  I do not believe anyone will support them, even if they promise to give away $1M to every person.

 


Doctor Biden


 


"Hey doc, I'm running a little fever.  Somethin goin around?  Can't say?  Well, like, what kind of doctor are you?"  

And isn't it strange that a person from Northwestern would be the one to complain.  After all, degrees were used as a form a social advancement for downtrodden Commies throughout Northwesternland.  but that is different I suppose, than a Cronie with a presumed doctorate from "his state".  You can use doctor in the first instance because it is a form of ascendancy; without the Doctor entitlement, really what good is giving them a doctorate?  Like Obama's Peace prize.   But in the second instance there is no ascendancy required- a cronie's wife, well is just another cronie.  Some have military medals and various awards, Delaware Conspicuous Service Award, etc. 

The question is is it mysogynistic to call Jill "Doctor"?  Does this not deprive her of  actually learning and researching, of being taken seriously as a woman and accomplishing something?  Once you have it, I mean, isn't it too late?  She would have to be called Doctor Doctor.  Once she is given the crony degree, the educators  have turned her into a demure bimbo for life.

I have seen it all.  The problem is often nepotism.  I have seen a "Doctor" get a degree in six months by using someone elses' work.  I have seen many cases like this- people who really did no thesis.  One guy had a dissertation with a few front pages and a few back pages with nothing in between.  I have seen people without a defense, and some who zeroxed pages out a textbook for their PhDs.  Another problem is race.  Diversity means you can quickly graduate "doctors" in your circle if they have the same race as you.  Let me tell you friend: For those of us who earned our degrees, these people: the nepotists and the diversifiers, are not ever called "Doctor".  We await the day the nepotists are arrested.  And people who cheat to acquire degrees banned from the halls of academia for life. 


Jill is no doctor.



Saturday, December 19, 2020

Cyberattack

 



Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum, in July, raised concerns about a possible cyberattack.  Recall he earlier raised concerns about a pandemic.  He is the spokesperson for Global Corporate control as constituted through what was the United Nations.  The World Economic Forum has basically taken the UN over, and is reconstituting it as corporate control over all nations.  Of course, the UN really had little to say about this, and to a large extent it is baloney.  No one has to listen to the UN as spokespiece for WEC, except the captive media, and certain lackey leaders of countries, some who may have visited Epstein's Island.

Besides having corrupted the US vote, and having created the pandemic, we now have a cyber-crisis being blamed on Russia.  This is so absurd.  

One problem with corporate control, is you have nothing to say about what they do; people like the Soros family, the Rothschilds, the Schwabs, and the bankers.  They are presenting themselves through Schwab as a socialist entity, but he is just their weird leader and figure head of the corporate structure that hands him his pieces of paper to read.  Corporate is Fascist.  They impose, and you have no government that will stand up for your rights and ensure you are safe living in this world.  So, they roll out 5G.  Only P. Trump stood up to them.  They were willing to basically use the general public as guinea pigs when it came to safety of these systems.  Now with vaccines, the fast-tracking of these treatments means the FDA is basically sitting this out, and frontline medical workers are the guinea pigs.  One of the vaccines may alter your genetics permanently, and who will know what effects that will have?  The C19 phenomena is leading to corporate controlled injections, the purpose of which we may have little to say about.  

What benefit would WEC get out of a cyberattack?   Well, they might obtain control over independently operating networks, in the same way they are gaining control over businesses with C19.  they could destroy old electronics used in networks and replace it with Huawei-like components.

Here is Klaus Schwab, talking about cyberattacks as if he is talking from Moonbase:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/1nQRx0zn0Jj7/


Thursday, December 17, 2020

Social Fabric is Disintegrating




 I have noticed, regrettably people are feeling more and more unsafe to just go outside.  They are becoming afraid to encounter other people.  Not everyone, of course, but more and more it is so.

What is it?  Well, C19 lockdowns have had an effect on some people's nervous systems.  They have become accustomed to seeing only a few other people.  It is making them feel uneasy and insecure around other people.  Plus they are often wearing masks and you cannot see who they are and their facial expressions.  Are they sick?  Are they dangerous? 

Not just that, but also it is the riots and social tension out there.  People are acting out politically and harming others, often innocent people.  Some people are afraid of having their cars damaged, or being personally assaulted.   They are afraid of talking to other people, or crossing their path.  They are afraid because they think the police may not be protecting people.

Critics of this situation are saying it is like living in a Banana Republic, or Moscow.

How could we let this happen to us?  It appears some adventurous people like Hunter Biden became men of the world, learned foreign vices, and learned repressive tactics from foreign leaders and kind of assimilated them, thinking perhaps they could do the same.  It is not only politicians that we are presumed to have voted into office, it is also business people who operate abroad and  bring the mentality of the people they come to know back home.  We lose our free press, we lose our privacy rights, etc.

All the vices and diseases we rid ourselves of, are being brought back in, and sold to us as a new order.  Obviously we are not influencing the people abroad, but rather the opposite.  And have you had one of those machines follow you in an aisle in Walmart?



Wednesday, December 16, 2020

Californipassport

 


We are all thinking about ballots, and how to restore the integrity of the vote.  IT requires an imposition of order, apparently.  We all know agitators from California are involved in many of the street crimes and riots.  We know that drugs roll out of there all over the country.  We know the state is occupied with non-English speaking people, many of whom are not assimilated into our country.  Once illegal aliens enter California, they are in.  They pick a little fruit and could go anywhere.  We have had a few waves of transitory Californians here in WI, using accompanied by a crime wave.  People from SanFrancisco, were in the front wave of all the riots in places like Portland, and Chicago.

And that is just the international part, and the homosexual parts.  There are rough groups that roll out of there that could terrorize the entire West: Biker gangs, wild events, and rapper groups.  And the Chinese lovers.

We here in WI would appreciate it if they were required to obtain passports to enter the US.  Really, its no big deal- so why not have them get a little booklet that lets people know if they are leaving, and where they might be going.  Do they enter from Mexico and leave again in a few weeks?  Is something dangerous setting up in Las Vegas?  Are they having sex with children in Arizona, or Nevada?

Minneapolis, you might think, would be more concerning.  But Californians want more than Sharia Law- they want to violate you.  Like did that guy just place something in my drink?  IS he from California?  Almost for sure.

We might want to throw out their vote too, but until God floats it out into the ocean, they' re still a part of the United States.  WE need California in case our children do not right in boot camp.  But they shouldn't be allowed to run for national office.



Tuesday, December 15, 2020

Finally Saying Goodbye to Elaine Chao?

 



WE recall Wendy, who was rumored to have thrown Rupert Murdoch under a piano.  But then her social saliency receeded.  After serving many years in D.C., and an obvious overture to the Chinese, people have wondered about her relationship with McConnell, his rise to leader in the Senate, and their connections to Mainland China.  Her parents own a shipping business, and ... she was made Transportation Secretary, and was rumored to have direct connections to the Chinese Politburo. 

Mitch has always been a complex fellow.  A supposed Conservative, he also chums with the like of Bill Clinton. Peter Schweiter has claimed China was drawn to this couple and used their influence to cement in the loyalty of the McConnells.  No doubt Mitch is where he is, to prevent any turn against the Chinese trade.  Pretty obvious.  He has a popularity of 10%, and won the election in Kentucky by 57%. 

Chao thus, has always been the Golden Lady of Chinese Shipping, able to write large checks to various causes.  She has never had children, and her appearance has gone through various alterations, like only a wealthy woman can. She is a large lady, described having "Large boats". Wait a minute.  Her hand- the ring finger is shorter than her index finger.  Maybe a sign of royalty?



WE have a President-Unelected



This is probably the worst period in US history since the Civil War.  We have a President-UnElected, a majority of people do not believe has won.  What will happen?  

Who is the masked man? We do not really know who Joe is these days.  He had been a blue collar, union supporter back in the day, and he actually tried to recreate that impression for this election, just as Obama appeared to be a southern Baptist Black.  It is a bit confusing, like trying to figure out how the dull guy who pardoned Nixon got his name, was privileged in his youth, and ascended to high office.

And imagine if JFK had Malcolm X as his VP.  Would Chicago have gone down as it did?  What if JFK's brother made millions selling vodka in the US, made in the USSR?  You would have even more reason to oppose him, I suppose.  He would have been a dogshit president from the getgo, and that is who Biden is.  We are to believe despite what our eyes see and our minds know, that he was the popular choice.  Like he said, "You will support me, right? We are all together in this, okay?".

  I mean otherwise there are huge brewing problems.  Like, I mean, insurrection of the second kind.  If Harris is thought to be directing policy, LOOK OUT.  There will be a wall of dissent closing in, that nothing will stop - no amount of money, ... or judge, or guard.

  His job, if he decides to accept it, is to capitulate to the Chinese Communists. He is giving up as the best way to go- really without a skirmish.  As our restaurants go Chinese, how will that sit with the rest of us?  The Left seized this position through coercion.  No doubt a large portion of the US populace will feel like they have been maced.


Monday, December 14, 2020

Christian Economics

 



Is it Keynesian, or perhaps Marxist?  Is it Popiary Monetarism?

I do not know the answer.  Surely Christian organizations prior to Tammy Faye Baker existed, and in fact many of our contemporary institutions were founded by churches and Christian missions, without IPOs.  They started universities and hospitals.  Are we missing out on something when we diminish the role of Christianity in economics?

What is Christian Economics? What does this mean? 

 "it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God"

Wealth acquisition obviously is not the Christian goal. Firstly, I would think it is the maintenance or caretaking of Christendom, for we believe this is the truly best way to live.  It has proven itself in the creation of civilization, and civility.  It is inclusive, and unbigoted, and instituted that way by Constantine.  It brought dissimilar people together, and embraced intercommunication.  The Holy Spirit brought tongues to Christ's disciples to spread his word to all nations.    

There is usually a distinct dislike for the effects of bribing that leads to corruption, or in other words less reliance solely on the use of money, and the desire for money:

 1 Tim 6.10 "or the desire of money is the root of all evils; which some coveting have erred from the faith, and have entangled themselves in many sorrows."

It is interesting that Crusaders departed for the Holyland without provisions but acquired them from villagers on their path, as charitable offerings.  How many would do this to support air forces that bombed Iraq, I wonder?

Then there is the issue of Usury, or as some people call it: the time value of money.  However, money might increase or decrease in value over time, but interest is always a burden to the taker of a loan.  For transactions that are not monetary or without interest, time is handled some other way, or not at all.

Capitalism, as captures of societies by financial interests and certain ethnic groups, has run its course, and has lost popularity.  There are now a few very rich capitalists and many who dislike them.  Their control is crude, and calamitous.  Christianity on the other hand is a form of growth and conversion- they built cities and dedicated them to God.  We have reduced our participation in faith to a ritual, and perhaps what we ought to be doing, is using our faith to change the world around us, as was done earlier.  Your faith is a way to live, not just something you do in a building.  It is not just social rules for children, it is a way for participants to associate and live- to support your family.  They rid societies of sacrifices, cannibalism, slavery, and gangsterism.  They imposed an order: this is good and that not as good, that is bad and should be outlawed.  Certain things should not be seen, other things should not be heard.  Christians policed themselves. They created a spark- through order they made life tolerable, less fearful, and comfortable enough to make people want to live and improve their lives. They too, can adapt to current conditions to rid us of our contemporary maladies which are multiplying every day in the City of Man.  There could be a New Advent.


 







Sunday, December 13, 2020

The Beauty of Proper Democracy

 



The leader selected by an exercise of the will of the people, is the beauty of the democratic system. If it's an August moment, as people pace through lines to register eventually their vote, then to go to a place where they await the accumulated tally.  You are there, like your parents, and their parents before them. Destiny awaits.  God watches.


Such a system is beautiful, but it is not the system we have. We look around us to see where we have failed. .We are mired in confusion, misdirected by lies, having our will shunted aside by the unpatriotic . Will the cheaters lead us? How will we inaugurate our rightful leader? We grope in the dark .The Lawless have spiked the system, and likely have been for some time.  How could these people be democratic? 


Saturday, December 12, 2020

No Standing?

 



The Supreme Court would not hear the case brought by the White House of voting irregularities in some states, brought forth by the state of Texas, saying they had no standing.  It was the Supreme Court that apparently had the inability to stand with the suit, fearing repercussions.  They needed to go against standard practice and address the standing Texas has- but did not.  As a result there is an unclosed rift between these states.

On its face the state of Texas and any state, is interdependent with other states when it comes to electing a president.  If several states cheat in the election affecting the result and if this has a harmful consequence to their state, then ... obviously there is standing.   In Texas, the border is a major issue, and cheating in these other states directly affects them.  They have seen the irregularities plainly, and surely they cannot be easily forgotten.  This swindle of votes is an unforgiveable crime.

What is to stop future cheating in tallying the vote?  This is the mechanism required, exactly.  Instead we have the high court, going along with those who have turned their backs on law enforcement, who ignore the people who corrupted the vote.  One after another like a mantra they have turned against righting the vote.  just like we were to socially distance, and accept Joe as the early president-elect.  


Wednesday, December 9, 2020

Guv-Non-competus

 



We are suffering from a disease.  But to all appearances the problem is not COVID, but what created and nurtured COVID.  Now, the NIH and CDC are about to launch a vaccine and possibly trying to force everyone to take it- that may be lethal to some, and causes severe reactions in many.  This is a bit frightening, that it is forced and possibly worse than the disease for which it is intended to assist you.  All this time they did not address the test issues - all the false positives - and this is all a symptom of corruption in government.  We cannot rely on them to do what is right - more likely they will go along with some hoax or another.  They are no longer our government but more so becoming a danger to us.  They are no longer there to protect our rights, but to try and take advantage of their position for themselves.  To engage them is harmful to yourself.  That is the real disease.

IT  has hit the DOJ, and the FBI.  Now it has scrambled the electory system, stealing away the public voice through spike voting.  This is no longer a government of, for, and by the people.  What has Congress done to correct anything?  Very little.  They are the causes of most of these problems: the dysfunction of government branches, the intrusion of illegal aliens, unchecked corporate initiatives, support for hoaxes: climate, the Russian election hoax, etc.  Most of this action is behind the scenes and goes unreported.  Congress is a club, and most of us are not members.  After all the smoke is cleared, they are always configured just the same, doing the same things.  Now there is the augury that a fixed group will be there, and nothing can change that.

For now and into the foreseeable future we might have to take those injections.  There may be more insults to you, your life, property, and outlook for the future.   Meanwhile some of the lawless people out there think the US economy is great, and that people can all live in the public domain off a government check without having to work.  Ya, sure.  Without Yankee ingenuity and muscle, they are just going to slowly collapse into an ever narrowing chasm of disregard.  There are few signs this trend is reversible.



Friday, December 4, 2020

To COVID or Not to COVID

That is the question. AS we sit in Elsinore, we contemplate our fate, one way or the other. WE realise it is largely a ruse, partly to support people who are our enemies, but still part of this is acceptable. We might reject socialism, for we do not wish to lose our individual rights, but we might like to see revisions in sectors of our economy that required revision. IT is a mixed bag, but the lockdown is unacceptable as a means toward any end. And I for one, have no desire to trade off my rights for anything.

 So when the messenger comes and says support COVID, for that is what we want- what can we say? In our mind's eye we can know- death statistics do not lie. We are seeing people with colds, with the flu, and possibly other maladies and induced conditions being portrayed as COVID. And so to defend this lie, is to invite oneself to be incarcerated to more of this, and loss of rights.

 Before the C19 disease phenomenon, first we had lawlessness on the part of the Democratic Party, Hillary at large, and many unprosecuted cases. For some time this same group promoted illegal voting, including illegals in political organizing and polling. This led to riots and calls to defund the police, just prior to the election assuring the greatest amount of illegal voting action. Covid-19 is largely coincident with this, and just as votes were flipped, various maladies were recategorized as Covid-associated, and deaths were called Covid-19 deaths, but really these deaths we know have been fromo other things: pneumonia, influenza, and colds, among many other things. We know this because actual mortality has not changed- there is no new cause of massive deaths at all. There is this appearance however, just as there is an appearance that Biden won the election. Biden on what he would do if he disagrees with Kamala: "I'll develop some disease and say I have to resign." 🤔 He is telling us the purpose of Covid-19 phenomena is to remove people from their jobs.

 Covid will probably never go away. It is a cold. It will keep coming back. The mechanism for removing people from their jobs with a positive test, will remain into the future unless we stop it. In the same way, if we are to return to legal and accountable voting, we must stop the illegal activities, and remove the climate of illegitimacy that hangs over the Left.

Tuesday, December 1, 2020

Socialism is Rising, and must be Confronted

 


Socialistic covens continue to operate, regardless of who is elected.  As Kamala Harris declared: "This will go on also after the election, and will not be affected by it."  They are moving toward community based standards, at the expense of individual rights.

I would guess these groups are possibly involved in corrupting the vote, afterwards denying any involvement.  There are three goals at present, maybe more, and they are attempting to carrying these out by placing people into positions that corrupt existing governmental services, and replace them with their own extralegal ones.  Their concerns:

1)  Low income people on public assistance should not be heterosexually married.  There are no laws that say this - what would appear to be a horrible imposition on our basic liberties - but they can be imposed in effect by case workers (Lightfoot: Either that or you could just shoot them).

2) They are working actively to take away ownership rights.  They see a broad channel for activities that impose external standards on an individual's property, essentially rendering them under the control of government operatives.  They could force you to let them use your property for a project that has nothing to do with you.  They could force you to let them gain entry to your land and home for various reasons, leading to them actually controlling access to your house and yard.  The slippage is in state, county and municipal officials, who do not impose municipal codes, or state laws.  Informally they might impose their own way of operating that is extralegal.  They are replacing laws with community standards.   So your property might be owned by you, but your neighbors might tell you what they do not like about how you use the property, and force you to make changes.  They might do this purely for political effect, and force you out of the community.

3)  They are actively engaged in using the health care system as a means to obtain social control.  Today we have COVID-19 treatment, and public health policies to consider.  It is not inconceivable people would be given viruses that are undesirable, or that treatment might be withheld.   This is probably already happening through microdecisions that are made everyday, made by personnel that are placed into those positions for that purpose.


Sunday, November 29, 2020

Revision in Voting Systems

 


If you own a computer, and obviously at least you are using one. you know Google can and does strafe your machine, and probably so does Microsoft, and the Chinese, and possibly the Russians.  They could be making small changes to your system and you would be oblivious.  Inside one of those updates, there could be anything- a virus, or a program to copy a directory to another location.  Many years ago already the attempt to control machines over the internet was established- you know - like remote control of aircraft, or ships.  If you have a cellphone data from your phone could be transmitted anywhere and most people would be totally oblivious. Apple placed location algorithms into its ROMs, so there are intrinsic modules in their phones.

So, if they place computers into voting halls, and connect them together, and one is connected to the internet, OBVIOUSLY anyone could alter things on those machines,  There is no question about that.  The question is who did it.  That is why it is a good crime.  It is hard to trace who did it.  We know this because crimes have been committed with computers and no one was found to be guilty.  In the NE for instance, someone spun up a turbine at a power plant, attempting to spin it to such high speeds it would explode.  We still do not know who did it.  Could have been a Russian, and perhaps the kid down the block.

Many system are still fairly wide open, and hence insecure.  They could place high levels of security into voting systems, and even use them to screen voters.  Nothing of this kind can be found.  These machines are fairly simple, as dumb as a slot machine.  They are there for one reason: in case someone wants to alter the tally, it is easy to do so, and it is also easy to obtain a current tally and transmit it somewhere.  You could imagine yourself on a modem doing this.

The limitations of these simple machines was fairly obvious all along, going back to when they were first used around the time of the Gore-Bush election.  People then stated paper ballots were secure, but these machines were a total joke.  We still have the same machines, more or less.  The machines are connected to Democratic operatives- fact.

So it seems our election system is totally insecure.  It is not the kind of system one would expect in a leading nation of the world, is it?  Have they been toggling votes since 2001?  Who decides what they wish to toggle, and who delivers the votes where?  Since electronic traces do not exist, and actually no internet traffic was blocked from anywhere during the election, anyone in the world could have altered the vote counts (recall it was Hillary that invited the Russians into her campaign, and where they might have become aware of our voting systems).  They are made to be fouled.  Tracing the party or parties that did it- almost impossible without gates, and on-the -fly security measures.  We have people who can just manage email, watching these machines.

It is possible to imagine P. Trump won the 2016 election, after all he was a populist and spoke to the issues important to most Americans.  This was after the existing parties went along with outsourcing all our jobs and telling us we are no longer needed, expecting to win with a facelift.   Fairly adept politics by P. Trump, right?  I think it is obvious, after the Mueller investigation as a payment, that the DNC undertook to fix this election since it is the only way they could win.  Biden made this obvious- he did not run and won.  He told us he would allow foreigners to invade the country, and what is wrong with China?  It is obvious the fix was in.  This is not like what P. Trump did to win. Rather than tantalize P. Trump by saying he cannot prove there was fraud and by whom- he should be asked how can the system be modernized so it works, and who was the likely culprit in fixing the election?  

I believe it was Soros et the Tides Foundation that did it.  Track the money if you can.  Like In Canada they were there far in advance of the election, and then moved out ahead of the deployment of these systems.  Like in the Ukraine, the infrastructure was set up by Soros.  Then operatives toggled the votes who were aware of these systems.

What now?  IT was an invalid election.  Fix the system and then go again.  I wonder how many races were affected?  I believe it would take two years to get secure systems in place.


Friday, November 27, 2020

Mr Joe Crasharoo

 


As P Trump is once again embroiled in a side issue, the nation is sliding into economic collapse.  there are many people out of work, partially because of C19.  These people cannot afford to pay rent.  There are also many home foreclosures in process.  And food lines.  It was just a week ago I was still being told there is nothing wrong with the economy. 

And what's your answer Joe?  First thing he shall issue executive orders to 1) Regulate the banking system 2) Reform the civil service, and 3) provide a jobs program called the CCC.  Oh wait that was FDR.  No- Joe is going to 1) open borders to unrestrained immigration, and 2) lift the ban on immigration from certain Muslim terror states.

When C19 is over, and many feel that will be when Joe takes over, the economy held up artificially by the Cares Act will collapse also.  Is it possible the people of the nation could have voted for Joe?

Almost certainly, we did not.  The vote was fixed, and not by minorities behind closed doors necessarily.  One sign of who was involved in overthrowing our election, was the ultimatum imposed by 160 companies on P Trump- vacate now, or we will not support Republican candidates in the Georgia election.  This is the sort of thing that does not care about the proper resolution of the election whatever.  Did they car about the election itself?  Would they have rigged the election?  Of course.  the people running these global companies are the enemy of the nation's people.  Joe did not win the election, and he surely knows that.  These people rigged up his win, or are acquiescing to it.  They want the weak leader in office to act as their proxy.  Biden as criminal is a tossaway anytime they want to rid themselves of him.  We might find comical Joe at the bottom of the reflecting pool.

What these companies are offering us is, well, nothing.  They promise a collapse, and ensuing chaos.  Have we been supporting them in the stock market, or through the use of their products?  Perhaps we should stop that.  Visa is one of the companies, the same that corrupted Nancy Pelosi.

We have faced the same process before.  Theodore Roosevelt has to bust the big Trusts, and he did that.  We can do it again.

https://needtoknow.news/2020/11/over-160-business-giants-including-some-who-backed-trump-pressured-him-to-transfer-power-to-biden/ 



Wednesday, November 25, 2020

Fascism

 


Often it is thought that the Right is the Fascist faction, but no- rather it is the Left.  If you doubt it look to see who is censoring what.  The goal here is to control minds through controlling speech.  If they cannot do that Musk is working on controlling thought using electronic devices.  People on the Right believe in free speech and free will.   

With the the attendant social changes being made the socially violent reaction of ostracization to simple speech is startling and alienating in a country with the first amendment.  Even in Europe people are provoked to laughter because of things like religious totalitarianism that demands nonblasphemous speech by others outside their religion.  This contrast can be dangerous and is alienating to Western minds.

Through circumstances and partially by choice we are mixing very alien cultures.  What is the best way to do this?  The tendency for eastern people is to use social coercion to obtain conformity.  We would see this in the west as Fascism.  We have gone from a largely tolerant society, now to one that tolerates nearly nothing.  Gangs out there enforce their code.  Looking at today's headlines: Ken Jennings of "Jeopardy" is under assault for a wheelchair joke, a school administrator is out because of a homophobic statement, and a major editor of a feminist newspaper is out because the staff confronted her over transphobia.  People's lives ands careers are at stake.  We have lost our sense of humor and bounce.  People are losing their tolerance toward people with differing opinions, to the point of violent outbreaks.

Why are we doing this to ourselves?  WE have smashed alien cultures together leading to a lack of tolerance and we are on the verge of violence.  We have to be afraid that talking might destroy our careers and family.  The rigidity in employment opportunities is leading people to become extremely intolerant.  

Frankly, I have not learned the new pronouns and probably never will.  We are a western nation, and we believe in free speech.  That is our standard.  People who cannot tolerate free speech are guilty of hatred and hate crimes if they act out against the speech of others.  That is how we build tolerance: free speaking and jokes, which are often a friendly way of expositing a cultural contrast.  Like two alienated friends, we adjust to one another based on our understanding of one another.  This is not what happens with intolerance obviously.  Free speech is a bridge, no speech is a barrier.





Monday, November 23, 2020

The Live Exercise

WE all know what a live exericse is: Instead of pretending to fire guns, and run around like you are under attack, soldiers use live ammo, and make the event as close to reality as possible, for the sake of gaining experiential knowledge of the "real" thing. This can happen- becaue the exercise is closed, and it is a simulation, so you really cannot aim to kill someone, right? Instead of a pantomime, they act like it is real. Someone could get shot by accident, so there is that concern as they go through the exercise. An actually real event, would have to entail real combat, real enemies, and real death. that is not permissable. 

 Should it be allowed that the media could report combat taking place, as a report about a live exercise, treating the exercise as real? You could view this as just an extension of the exercise. But the public are not part of combat readiness, right? Should they be compelled to go along, frightened by the media, as though the military attack is real? I would say no. P. Kennedy had children drilled to prepare for a possible nuclear attack. There was a real danger in Cuba, of a possible missile launch. People were frightened, and possibly felt more secure knowing there was a plan of action in case of emergency. BUT this is different than announcing like Orson Wells, that we are under attack. Missiles have been launched. Duck and cover! Thousands have been exposed to radiation they do not know about it. Seek medical assistance if you have the following symptoms... Is that not so? This is more than a live exercise for the sake of preparedness. It involves people that are not part of the exercise by choice, so actually for them it is not an exercise, but the real thing. They might stampede over to emergency rooms, with people being trampled to death. Enemies of the state could actually spread real radiation about in the confusion. All of a sudden the action is real- it is an assault on the public brought on by a "live exercise". Creating real fear in the public arena, is just plain terrorism. They cannot be involved in a preventative exercise like this that intends to terrorize them, and subject them to all the consequences of that. It is against their basic rights to have the government, or any group do that to them. Terror is not needed for preventative drills, It is a way to take away people's rights. 

 What P. Obama did, most presidents would not have done before him- but then he is/was a Muslim, and the guy who gave the Iranians billions of dollars, overlooked Benghazi, praised US traitors like Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, wanted uncontrolled Muslim immigration into the US, etc. Could he have thought like a terrorist when it came to public policy? So, take the New Town school shooting. Although it is not totally clear even now, but it was a live exercise with actors presented to the public as a real shooting. Probably the people involved believed it was for a good purpose - to get the guns out of people's hands, especially AR-15 type weaponry, and to keep weapons away from children, and people with serious mental problems. Also it was a drill, right, so emergency people could act it out, and say they learned something about preventative measures - the use of door locks, of school security measures, there was a discussion of whether teachers should carry, etc. All this could happen without the fright created by the media, treating this as real, right? The use of fright, to scare people into giving up guns - is terrorism. Hollywood/Clinton may have actually organized this, and they implicated Obama in it. 

 The media are the bullets in the guns. How do they decide what they treat as real? Truthfulness in reporting had been goal number one. They wanted to court the public trust, for the sake of their commercial rating. but clearly they have departed from this- away from education as a tool, to overtly representing false events as real, to terrorize the public, for groups like Hollywood, for the Democratic Party, for the banks, for Google, etc. They are on the path to abandonment, as the public now routinely doubts anything they say, and they are often right about questioning the verisimilitude of the media. People no longer want to know if it is true news, they want to know what can be done about this. The media are treating fake events as real- riots, demonstrations, shootings, etc, and ignoring real events like fraudulent voting, the national debt, runaway visas, examining the dysfunction at the FBI and DOJ, and the corruption of public officials.

 Which brings us to the great reset we know as Gate's live exercise: the Pandemic. They appear to have frightened the public into lockdown, destroyed companies and businesses, and made off with trillions of dollars of public money. We are to believe it is because they are listening to Schwab, and imposing rule through fear using this as a device. Guess what? It appears Schwab is a Fascist, right? So who will save us? Could it be, ... the financial industry, and corporations and their backers? Will we run to the UN that has been rearranged by Soros? Who are the real Fascists here? Whoever they are, the last group whose opinion it is that matters is the general public. Someone asked: "What is this all for? How does corporate know which services and products the public wants?" We are seeing ourselves increasingly isolated, powerless, with electrodes in our heads eating largely vegetarian diets, unable to separate virtual reality and real reality. We do not need to escape Earth to go to Mars so the human race survives in the event of a nuclear war. We need to go there to live a life of self-determination, to follow our dreams, and to exhibit our creativity. We need to really seriously consider this. There are more promised catastrophes awaiting us. We are having the Pandemic exercise now, and tomorrow we have the EMP catastrophe, and the cyberattack catastrophe.  Are we prepared?

Saturday, November 21, 2020

Are the Tides Turning?



 A report on the conjunction of Soros' Tides Foundation, and Dominion, shows vote fixing is possibly part of an international process serving the globalists, specifically the World Economic Forum.  So, this is rather big news.  Globalists fixed the vote in our national election.

So the question is: "What are we going to do about this?".  Isn't it a direct assault on our country?  They would seem to be the enemies of democracy everywhere.  The obvious thing to do is to infiltrate their organization and destroy it.  What are the chances?

The name Dominion harkens back to its use in religion, and our "Lord's Dominion".  They are declaring their goal is to utterly dominate the globe.  How many smaller races have they already fixed, judgeships, mayors, Congressmen, etc?

Too bad Julian Assange is not out and about.  He could have have the whole nine yards, the fumblers unable to get a handle on much of anything.  Could be why he doesn't have access to a keyboard.




Friday, November 20, 2020

Therapy to overcome Homosexual attraction

Would this human be better off if he had Conversion Therapy?

 

Members of the extreme left are upset that two Trump appointed judges have determined that conversion therapy is not illegal.  This is according to the first amendment, the right to religion, and the state shall not interfere.  A good example is a priest who has same sex attraction, who wants to get over it so he can be a good priest, should have the right to find professionals who can help him.  The same is true for an individual who wishes to just change his orientation so he can identify differently.  Should counseling be denied to these people, to force them in one way or another? 

There was a woman connected with Howard University who identified as Black, although racially she was white.  If she sought conversion therapy to be white, should it be denied?  Should Blacks all scream- it is racial bigotry in action here?  Are they are trying to kill Aunt Jemimah?  If she is coaxed to convert then does this not harm her Aunt Jemimah soul?

Often under consideration is a child who has been molested, who has been abused by someone who somehow gained influence over the individual.  How could anyone deny them therapy to reverse the brainwashing they incurred?  What this might involve could by anything, including sexually corrupting the child.  For this reason, and because parents might deem it important for their child, in the child's own interest,  to undergo conversion therapy, shouldn't that approach be available to them?  

Legal proceedings are one thing.  They involve clashes between opposing groups, or are synthetic- created for the sake of argument.  In reality, however, you can always find a therapist willing to help a child, to overcome tendencies harmful to them, or to help with conversion as they transition from one situation to another.   It may not be called sexual conversion therapy but it is there to be found.  It is great to see this- to actually have the legal right to acquire therapy.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2020/11/20/trump-judges-strike-down-bans-on-lgbtq-conversion-therapy/?sh=530dd22e3d7e



Wednesday, November 18, 2020

Urban Safety

 



There was a time you could walk down the street, and all you had to think about was identifying a pleasant smell emanating from somewhere.  After 9/11 this changed.  Smells created worries- "what is that?"  C19 is no different.  People are afraid elements exist in the environment, in products, sprayed on food, and possibly sprayed on the seats of mass transport, that could be endangering our health.  We faced ecoli problems from transported foods.  Internal social tension is making people afraid.  There exist many foreign elements, people who are our enemies who live among us.  There are many products in our country, that are made in foreign places, by people who do not know what noxious or dangerous materials are. and of they know, they do not care.

Do you recall the day that Ralph Nader led the way to Consumer Protection?  We do not hear much of that anymore.  Starting about 1995, consumer protection became a concern of the individual consumer.  You could go into Walmart or Kmart and see products with banned ingredients.  No one was telling you about it.  If dangerous elements were to be found in the subway, who would tell you?  The medical system is poor at recognizing environmentally dangerous substances, tending to interpret everything as biological. Many public health organizations these days, do not even measure lead in your water, even though they know aged inlet pipes exist with lead jointing.

Of recent concern is the recognition that many C19 symptoms could be explained by radiation exposure.  The extreme hypoxia could be explained by damaged red blood cells, and pneumonia induced by ionizing radiation.  Are we being poisoned by enemies of our state?  Is it possible food is being sprayed in supermarkets with radioactive materials? In the past we worried about gaseous atmospheric clouds of radiation, and later the possibility of dirty bombs, and now perhaps we should worry about micro-exposures.  there is also a long list of drugs and substances that can cause hemolytic anemia, like arsenic, various metals, Nitrofurantoin(used to fight urinary infections), and anti-malarial drugs. 

Beginning in March of this year, radiation specialists are reporting widespread signs of radiation distress in people, not dissimilar to damage from xrays or radiative cancer therapy.  The second wave of C19 they believe is natural, but they think the first wave may have been caused partially by radiation releases.  If this was the case would our government know?  IF they did would they tell us?

Instead of relaxing monitoring, and ignoring public health issues, perhaps we should do the opposite: be more vigilant.  We are in the mode that such vigilance is just an unnecessary cost.  We wait until there is a problem, and then address it.  We have seen how this C19 event has wrecked havoc with our economy.  Proactive concern could have kept this damage to a minimum. Without it, we may not even know what hit us.  WE have not improved the technological sophistication of our methods to keep up with the potential hazards.  We do not even have an accurate C19 test.





Monday, November 16, 2020

The Great Ripoff is Coming, may be already here


Many people are worried about increases in taxes, for that is a levy directly from your bank account to the government.  The government can take in other ways: through direct imposition of eminent domain, or through using condemnation laws.  This is the direct taking of your property, rescinding your rights to ownership.  The ability to control the things you need in life is a big part of your individual rights.  When there is a squabble over how you use things you own, or lease and this gets taken to court, it is existing law that applies, but some people are ignoring the existing laws that guarantee people basic rights, and as a consequence they are being lost.  Does the government refer to existing law in making decisions, or are they just imposing an ad hoc set of rules communicated to them by legislators, or by companies?

 WE have seen the slip: the FBI not knowing what to investigate, the DOJ enforcing some laws, but not others.  The laws on the books being ignored are increasing day to day.  Many will be surprised when they learn impositions upon them, leave them without recourse for the rights they believed they had, actually no longer exist even though they do in law.

The way our government works, is that legislators maintain the laws that are to be enforced.   They can update any laws, rescind a law or a body of laws, or create new laws. So if they intend to take away certain public protections, they would need to change the law in a fashion to accommodate these wishes. This requires the assent of the governing body, and in some cases would require changes to the Constitution in the form of an amendment which would require the assent of all the states.  When they short-circuit this process like they did with border enforcement, they take away the right of the electorate to have a voice.   There is no assent of the states, there is no motion in Congress, and so the changes are imposed regardless of whom you have elected.  And what did they do?  How have they changed things?  Well, if your property rights are being stolen, they do not really care to broadcast that to you.  The changes these people impose are invisible until you encounter them in some way.  

They still publish the law, and lawyers supposedly have fat books full of them, and case histories to which they refer, BUT why bother with all that if a call from a legislator or a company ignores all that and they are the defacto "rule of law"?  Why publish laws for people to read, believing it gives them rights they actually do not possess?  What good is a lawyer to you?

These activities are part of the "Economic Reset", ushered in by the C19 virus.  the World Economic Forum (WEF)  hopes to complete the reset by 2030.  It began by locking you down, and it will not get better.  They intend to take away all your rights, by taking all your ownership rights- basically stealing what you own.  You will have to request food preparation utensils, just to make your dinner.  People can use your living room when you are not there- but you may be making the home payments. You might be incredulous, but it is being planned and in some locations placed into operation off the books.

forbes article



Saturday, November 14, 2020

Outside the system

 


AS people internationalized, more and more control by national governments has slipped.  To control international corporate entities supposedly you need a global government.  I think this would be impossible- that national governments are already too large for checks and balances to work.  Over time even our state governments have stopped imposing their standards to the point many people feel the government no longer supports them, but instead just certain factions, often business factions rather than protect the rights of the general citizenry.  Often laws are not enforced, staffing is not provided, and there is no oversight.  Government people are connected to the people they are supposed to monitor and control.

Do we need a red scare?  Maybe something more strident?  Because of open borders and openness to foreign people getting into business and government, the ticket often being a degree or a visa, people have systematically infiltrated our country.  We have too much foreign/antinational/international  influence in the country and it is hard for it to function this way.  Not only that but it is Communist/Socialist and totalitarian.    IT is Soros.  Soros has tumbled other nations, and as people have pointed out- he does it in democratic nations through infiltration by his agents, often Jewish, and corrupts the vote.  This is how he is trying to take over the Ukraine.  His agents there are from Canada, and New Jersey.  Is Soros' money, and big tech's know how corrupting our country?  Soros targets government positions, media, and is not shy about activities like his hedge fund actions- starting up companies just for the sake creating a false impression- like fact checking companies.  These companies come and go.  He targets sensitive elections, often judgeships.  He has placed people into almost all Democratically held state governments.  He keeps working month after month, year after year to corrupt and overthrow a nation.  

This is where we have been at, with the riots, the C19 situation, and voter fraud.  With the riots, the police did not arrest people, because the judges for some reason would not convict anyone of looting, or destruction of property.  Why was that?  We seem to have a shortage of people who do the right thing.  If they could not convict an arsonist, or people who murdered someone by kicking in their head, how do you suppose these same people can handle the vote?  Wouldn't you expect if serious shenanigans were going on, they would just say "Defund the overseers!", or a judge saying: "We will not convict anyone connected with voter fraud."?  There is a ton of evidence of wrongdoing in the election.  Can this be brought to court, and properly adjudicated?  All they have talked about so far is an accounting showing registrations for ballots.  There probably are 100s of thousands or more, of bad registrations.  There would have to be since there were truckloads of ballots brought in to some locations.  What's more, the people doing the accounting are the same people who oversaw the original vote.  If they changed numbers using Dominion servers for example, they could just lie about there being corresponding ballots and registrations.  That is one thing P. Trump might do: see how many illegals voted by using the census.  Oops, it does not distinguish in this census, although that is one of its main purposes.  He said he could use other means. Well, did he?  If he did, then he can pick a place and tell you how many illegals voted and were registered.  There were many 100s of thousands, maybe millions of fake papers sent here by the Chinese.  Did anyone complain?  Was anyone arrested for acquiring false papers?

Why wasn't more done before the election?  Why did they go ahead with the election when they knew there were all kinds of problems?  Now it looks like P. Trump may spend the remainder of this term with another pile of BS rather than forward any programs.  If he prevails they will possibly have prepared another assault on his office.  He is either almost totally powerless (which he is really not), or perhaps he remains in office to assuage the Saints of Killers, all those who believe in distinguishing right and wrong, good and evil, and are willing to back it up with a Bible verse and a gun; until such a time the steam as measured by social media goes out of their sails.  For all appearances, P. Trump is still needed for this purpose, even though he constrained the availability of bullets (must be depots of bullets?).  For all appearances he presides as the Commies are setting up.  Strange isn't it he has not confronted them?  Day after day they are corrupting the national scene, our media, etc, and he has yet to go after anyone, or to stop the ongoing encroachment.  If Soros is paying people to organize riots, can they not be confronted?

What I am saying here, is that if P. Trump does not fight the corrupters and solicit assistance, he can never win.  He has to go on the offensive and stop/disrupt the organization of the anti-US corrupters.  There is another way to compel his agenda, and the people's desires.  Rather than fight the tassel-topped people paid by these operatives, why not directly place a monkey wrench into Commie plans?  P. Trump is chasing their tails here, rather than going after the heads.  If politics are not the answer, there are other answers.  I would think if elections are impossible because outside forces are corrupting our process, serious repercussions almost must follow.  We are talking about the country here, and our democracy.

If P. Trump does not win, then I would imagine we might see underground militias form, that may disrupt tassel-topped people's initiatives.  We are talking about the better half of our society, that will almost undoubtedly resist.  They have already done so, against Clinton.  This situation is far worse.



Thursday, November 12, 2020

Biden is disqualified!

 


Even before P. Trump took office, he was attacked.  This has never happened before.  He has been assailed ever since.  Can he reverse the constant pummeling long enough to ascertain the corruption in this election, and arrest the main perpetrators?

There is plentiful evidence of serious corruption, and it is not of the variety of someone filling out two ballots instead on one, kind.  IF so a recount would not change the vote tally. But that is beside the point, for serious fraud occurred, like counting ballots for day when it was impermissible.  We are facing widespread corruption people with boxes of ballots adding them in after Nov 3.  It is like what occurred with the bricks, prior to the rioting, showing it was organized, and centrally funded.  Biden leads, then voting at polls placed P Trump in the lead, and then after the election Biden kept accumulating more votes until he won, but there was no reason for the swing back for Biden.  Why would this arise?

Biden acted like a buffoon throughout the campaign.  He acted like a gunslinger.  He sat back and waited for the tally to go his way, and when it did he declared himself winner.  He dared P Trump to prove otherwise.  Were Soros' goons already deployed?  On the payroll?  Soros works in a way similar to the Chinese- he just keeps pressuring people out of positions, and moving his Jewish friends in to take their place.  Over time he can corrupt key positions in a way that supports his plans.  His squads have done the same thing in elections in other places.  His people are intimidating the lawyers who are examining the election fraud.  Threats are being made, statements to the effect they will lose their license and never practice again.  They are moving aggressively, trying to prevent an actual examination of the situation.  It is similar to what Mueller did, to prevent P Trump from adjudicating any cases while he was being investigated.  There must be a significant panic on the Left, and possibly fear of incarceration.  This might include the Clintons, Pelosi, Kerry, and the Bidens,  Did Soros take his Antifa riot inciters and change them into hauling bails of ballots around?  Were they also involved with staging events at hospitals in connection with C19?  It is the government's normal job to handle these situations typically by the CIA, the FBI, and the DOJ. Can they handle this?  Are they compromised to the point an examination of the vote is difficult?  Will they find some new front on which to assault P Trump so he has difficulty investigating the election?

There is a point the vote is so messed, you must actually concede it was crazy to hold an election.  There were riots involving foreign groups.  We knew they were externally funded by people trying to overthrow our government.  They were not tracked or apprehended, at least not much to my knowledge, even though they have been operating in this country probably for four years.  If a group penetrates into our country, even our voting polls, to the point they will not let anyone in to see what they are doing- isn't that an invalid election?  This is not a court case.  

We need to take the offensive with those who are attacking our institutions, our businesses, and taking over our streets.  We can predict this from patterns adopted by the color revolutions elsewhere. The enemy is here.  People see it.  Why can't our government?  If Russians were blazing our election polls you would stop the election, right?  We just had people trying to set the White House ablaze and they are still running around the country.

ID: Soros.  How hard is that?  Where is our surveillance on him?  Where is the tracking on his agents, and the people he has placed in our government?  Shouldn't he be considered to be at least as bad as bin Ladin?

 And Biden- didn't he educe all the voting fraud?  He is not fit to be dog catcher in this country.

   https://twitter.com/i/status/1326323889417322497

Wednesday, November 11, 2020

Underground Press?

 


People who have been freely posting on the web, until they have been cutoff, have tolerated the censorship, but now they sense two things: 1) the internet is a trap- a commercial entity not for public utility, but really a venue provided by a company who can cut you off in an instant, including the government, and 2)  it is potentially dangerous for people to use it.  According to one social media leader: "People can live without it.  Its really not such a big deal."

The first item has been demonstrated with the election.  People were shut off many company platforms.  Companies used excuses to cut people off, and imposed censorship.  So the ability to express yourself can be manipulated, and just when you need it most- zap, it is gone.  Imagine if they shut off your telephone service so you could not talk to anyone, or only allowed you to say certain things on your telephone.  That is possible these days.  It could happen.  This makes you wonder if you didn't like your old analog phone better.  Maybe P-mail is better than E-mail too.  Post Office: Can you provide secure p-internet services that are secure for users?  No intervention.  No monitoring.  Colorblind, and politically neutral?  At first we could settle just for secure electronic P-mail no one can read but the recipient, and any tampering will result in stiff penalties, just like intentionally opening someone's mail.

IT has always overshadowed the internet, that you could place a photo out there, and the next thing you know- you have a stalker.  This has caused many people just to use the internet to show their pets.  My doggie is a cute Dobermann Pincer.  Isn't he sweet?   No- usually they are like little fluff balls below the knee in height.  Beyond personal disputes in a public forum being a problem, there is the problem of recording your activities and potentially using them against you.   This can be quite innocent on your part, but you express yourself, and someone brings this to the attention of someone who hates that opinion and they can make enemies for you.  Not only that, since it is recorded - a political faction can use this information and determine you are a foe, like Occasional-Cortex expressed recently to create blacklists of people and rub them out.  If you wanted to form the Republican Party today using the Internet - you might be placed on a hit list.  In a recent attempt to recall Governor Evers here in WI which should have been an easy thing to do considering state sentiments regarding the lockdown, this failed possibly because using the Internet Ever's supporters might have interfered because they knew where people would meet to collect signatures, etc.

Could the Internet serve as a form of expression for public opinion?  As an alternate grass roots news service?  Could it be a way to publish a pamphlet to people telling them to beware of this and that?  As it is, no.  We have seen in fact companies have taken over the Internet, and they censor traffic.  They also can cut you off.  When something is not going right, that is when you need the service.  That is also the point at which you get switched off- just like they smashed your little printing press in the past.  Corporations and International groups have taken over the free net, and it is no longer free, and it is no longer national either.

What can be done to maintain a free press?  Go Dark.  WE might have to go into the dark night.  WE could encrypt everything so it is not readable unless you have a decrypter.  This would be content blind communications.  Not too social but it would get passed through the net.

Would it be possible to recover the Internet we knew and loved, before it was usurped by Google?  IT might be possible to change Al Gore's Internet, to make it the IWKL Internet by changing the packet protocol.  By using the same net but changing the packet protocols they would be unrecognized by standard internet services, but passed to computers that could decipher the information.  Thus the same addressing and communications channels could be used.  Al that needs to be done is to demand a certain bandwidth for IWKL-net be provided, as a legal requirement.  This net could be  national, and secure from intervention by hostile digital groups like Google.  All memory of your communications would be short lived, and zero unless it is necessary.  You would also need a network card that speaks to IWKL-net.

So if getting the big tech Internet companies to meet our expectations is too difficult, perhaps competition in this arena would provide an alternative.  Let the people decide what they prefer.  All that is required is a little hardware, and bandwidth from the existing system (which they should supply in lieu of the fact they have been breaking the rules and public expectations for years for which they have a remarkable amount of cash).


Tuesday, November 10, 2020

What's with the Main stream Media?

 Just imagine you groomed yourself, starved yourself, and this increased your personal esteem, and then someone told you that you are no longer needed?

Blech... right?  High 6 figures, and 7 figures.  Man, I am worth it.  Don Lemon - $4M.  He could cry like a little sissy at the idea he is no longer wanted.  What is he going to do?  CNN salaries are fairly high, and for what?  Well - presenting fake news.

The MSM are really largely redundant, and propaganda outlets.  the political people on both sides see the press as unnecessary.  the Left because if they are in office, and probably would be without the MSM, would no longer need all those relic networks.  the Right because they were entirely alienated by the MSM, would like to see them jump into the ocean.  P. Trump said, just before the election he would like to start up new news services and get rid of all of them.  In return they called several states early and spread rumors that they knew Trump would lose - the fix was in.

Expect consolidation.  Who will survive?  Well, Lemon put on a performance Jimmy Swaggert would have enjoyed.  He was betting all those minorities would cry out to see him on the air again.  This situation, may present us with more entertainment like this- the best so far they have had to offer in years.  It is like Real TV.



Monday, November 9, 2020

Lets come together, right now!

 



Sleepy Joe woke to believing in national unity, although he thinks there is no nation when he is actually fully awake.  At least I think he does.  He wants unity.  Okay, starting right now- lets place Hunter and Hillary front and center, along with all the evidence, and see what they did and if that is okay, and whether or not they broke laws.   WE need to restore the Dept. of State, among other departments.

Lets look over the election results together, right now.  Should have before, but then they locked observers out.  Together, we need a plan to secure our elections.  Lets work on that, now.

  Biden might start with trying to get himself together: is there a nation?  What is he president of, in his own mind?


Biden Pre-Impeachment


Many people now realize who Joe Biden is, and say they would like to change their vote from him to Trump.  So of the miniscule number of votes he actually got, and there must have been some, if people were allowed to change their vote based on new information, he would even have fewer votes.

The lockdown he says he will implement upon getting into office-  is unconstitutional.  For that he should be pre-impeached- disqualified, or simply nullified.  What kind of president would lock people down, destroying their livelihoods, when the threat of the virus to them is miniscule? Would people vote for someone like that if they understood this?  The next Socialistic step is to find a way to eliminate those who are unsupported.  Who could get elected on that?  It appears Joe is more like a foreign agent, maybe from China.  C19 is the reason your are locked down, and C19 eventually in lockdown will kill lots of people.

What is next?  Maybe because of global warming he will force our petroleum companies to give gasoline to Africans, and to ration ours.  Good deal.  We must stop that global warming.