 |
Justice Larry
|
Ruth Ginsburg was nominated to the high court by Bill Clinton. She was not a great justice as some are saying. In fact she was one of the worst. she should have never been approved because of her radical views on sex. She rode the wave of the surge for the equal rights amendment, which she interpreted as making the law colorblind wrt sex. Her views were so radical the ERA was rejected, even though many believed a statement expressly saying women should not be discriminated against, was appropriate.
She was raised to the DC circuit court by Jimmy Carter, based on the 1977 document "Sex Bias in the US Code". but who actually read this radical feminist document? It addressed bias, but also eliminated sexual distinctions. She might have advocated for example, men and women use the same bathrooms. Everything was unisex in her viewpoint. So she advocated men and women should occupy the same prisons and reformatories, and women should be able to do whatever they please with their bodies and in any roles they choose, including lesbian relationships and prostitution. She also advocated women for combat. She advocated sex integration for girl scouts and boy scouts. She called for the elimination of Mother's Day and Father's Day. And called for the age of consent for sex be lowered to 12. She called for the elimination of referring to men as bread-winners, and women as home-makers, and called for a comprehensive governmentally supported program of child care.
She took her radicalism into the realm of language, saying all terms referring to sex differences be struck from the laws: words like mankind, serviceman, father, mother, brother, and sister. Also all personal pronouns be struck like his, hers, etc. This is always a sign of radicalism: the desire to control thinking through the control of language. She should know the 1st amendment leaves language free, as ideas are free.
And she not only advocated unilateral abortion according to a women's wishes, but also that women should not have to pay for it - advocating instead they should have a Constitutional right to a government funded abortion.
Ginsburg lived her whole life immersed in the Jewish culture: so that is also a women's right- the choice of an ethnocentric life if one chooses. It could be the case Ginsburg presented the Jewish "Wall St. view on what the general culture should adopt in changing American roles for women, rather than her own views. After all she wore her hair long, and also wore dresses.
Clinton nominated her because she agreed to uphold Clinton's sense of Privacy Rights. No one can recall a time she raised this concern in any way that was universally adopted. She had no apology, and raised no concern about privacy losses in our electronic age. Like views on women, the prevalent culture has the final say about what it adopts and accepts.
Remember goys: "All sex is rape, unless a man can prove a woman gave her sober consent.