We continue to face an unwanted subterranean revolution few of us want. Obama launched the homosexual acceptability movement. I was surprised to find they were parading around as many cities as possible afterward. They wanted freedom, ... but parading it around, I mean wasn't it asking for a backlash? Like always there are many aspects of the homosexual lifestyle that are underground, but if above ground we find them offensive. Back in the old days: "Ask no questions, and we'll tell you no lies." Things like open homosexual affection today are hidden, but not long ago people tried without much success, doing this in malls. Did they kill the malls? I know when they did this they were arrested in many cases. People still deeply dislike being approached by a homosexual, as a potential sexual partner. And, they detest Gays working at Disney, and homosexuals injected into films as social programming.
So this lifestyle, except for the pronounced parades, has receded although perhaps not around San Francisco. They are more actively engaged in their activities than before, but much of what they do, and what people do to support them is masked. I dare to say we do not have to bake them wedding cakes (a big showcase situation for public consumption), nor are we to be forced to let them adopt our children, or anyone else's.
In their subterranean world, however, they continue to seek out children for sexual relations, and some do this through adoption. The glut of children in the US and elsewhere in the world has made them available even to those who seek these relations, and without fanfare or obvious advertisement pools of children are used and then discarded, for another pool of children.
WE have two major things to be concerned about. First, sex with children by homosexuals is leading other adults into sexual relations with children. This is bad. I do not understand how adults want just a carnal relationship like this ... but they are susceptible to this behavior. Second, to give homosexuals the chance to be happy with children, people are pandering to them, and producing them. This secret activity is widespread and kept subterranean, and all liberal entities not only hire homosexuals, they create an atmosphere around them they want, and this includes supplying them children. This is what Pizzagate is, and Ellen Degenerate's Wayfair. It is a political putsch, going forward although illegal- BECAUSE they do not care about the law. As the Pope stated: "It is against the law.", as if it stood in the way of people having fun.
It has been a long time since some churches embraced homosexuality. Now, the Methodists are separating into two groups because some could not reconcile Christianity and homosexuality. They were already expected to divide into two or three factions, but they have been delayed due to C19. It could also be that these groups hate to undergo schism, and are still trying to cover all bases and keep it together. That is a matter of power, not of principle. In this case the pro-normal church no doubt will be the faction to endure.
Christians will be facing a time of crisis. They need to separate themselves from obvious corruption, in order that their appellations do not fall on deaf ears. IT is easy to do- the bishops declare themselves orthodox or not, and parishioners then go to whatever church they believe is right. It probably is the only way for the real church to shed the disorder.
WE all know Francis grew up in a brothel, and served as a bouncer. How did he become a priest? I thought perhaps he had a time in his life he saw the error of these ways, - BUT what if priests were visiting the brothel? Could that be? Could there be that many priests in brothels that he ultimately became Pope? As the Pope embraces the notion of civil unions, people would be shocked, just that he has taken these strange positions before. How can he do this when being a homosexual is a mortal sin, and anyone in a civil union is condemned to Hell? IS he inviting them to Hell? This Pope and his neo-religious ideas are starkly contrasting with his establishment. Please- no one ask if we can take our dogs to church. Francis: "Is there a Hell?" If you say no, it is the surest way to find it.
WE cannot abandon our Catholic friends in Africa who cannot accept this change, in such stark contrast to the faith. We cannot ignore the tests we have coming to us in the near future, and we should not accept disordered lives like this, not caring about their lives. It is a shame we did not intercept their recruitment when they were younger. We must reject this corruption. If not to save children from corruption, then to avoid the destruction they cause in civil matters- they being involved in Seattle protests, and all BLM activities, and as mayors in cities like Chicago and DC, they incited violence and withdrew police. In DC they threatened to burn the White House down. Destructiveness is part of their life cycle, and to avoid that you must avoid letting them rise to the occasion.