Revision in Voting Systems

 

If you own a computer, and obviously at least you are using one. you know Google can and does strafe your machine, and probably so does Microsoft, and the Chinese, and possibly the Russians.  They could be making small changes to your system and you would be oblivious.  Inside one of those updates, there could be anything- a virus, or a program to copy a directory to another location.  Many years ago already the attempt to control machines over the internet was established- you know - like remote control of aircraft, or ships.  If you have a cellphone data from your phone could be transmitted anywhere and most people would be totally oblivious. Apple placed location algorithms into its ROMs, so there are intrinsic modules in their phones.

So, if they place computers into voting halls, and connect them together, and one is connected to the internet, OBVIOUSLY anyone could alter things on those machines,  There is no question about that.  The question is who did it.  That is why it is a good crime.  It is hard to trace who did it.  We know this because crimes have been committed with computers and no one was found to be guilty.  In the NE for instance, someone spun up a turbine at a power plant, attempting to spin it to such high speeds it would explode.  We still do not know who did it.  Could have been a Russian, and perhaps the kid down the block.

Many system are still fairly wide open, and hence insecure.  They could place high levels of security into voting systems, and even use them to screen voters.  Nothing of this kind can be found.  These machines are fairly simple, as dumb as a slot machine.  They are there for one reason: in case someone wants to alter the tally, it is easy to do so, and it is also easy to obtain a current tally and transmit it somewhere.  You could imagine yourself on a modem doing this.

The limitations of these simple machines was fairly obvious all along, going back to when they were first used around the time of the Gore-Bush election.  People then stated paper ballots were secure, but these machines were a total joke.  We still have the same machines, more or less.  The machines are connected to Democratic operatives- fact.

So it seems our election system is totally insecure.  It is not the kind of system one would expect in a leading nation of the world, is it?  Have they been toggling votes since 2001?  Who decides what they wish to toggle, and who delivers the votes where?  Since electronic traces do not exist, and actually no internet traffic was blocked from anywhere during the election, anyone in the world could have altered the vote counts (recall it was Hillary that invited the Russians into her campaign, and where they might have become aware of our voting systems).  They are made to be fouled.  Tracing the party or parties that did it- almost impossible without gates, and on-the -fly security measures.  We have people who can just manage email, watching these machines.

It is possible to imagine P. Trump won the 2016 election, after all he was a populist and spoke to the issues important to most Americans.  This was after the existing parties went along with outsourcing all our jobs and telling us we are no longer needed, expecting to win with a facelift.   Fairly adept politics by P. Trump, right?  I think it is obvious, after the Mueller investigation as a payment, that the DNC undertook to fix this election since it is the only way they could win.  Biden made this obvious- he did not run and won.  He told us he would allow foreigners to invade the country, and what is wrong with China?  It is obvious the fix was in.  This is not like what P. Trump did to win. Rather than tantalize P. Trump by saying he cannot prove there was fraud and by whom- he should be asked how can the system be modernized so it works, and who was the likely culprit in fixing the election?  

I believe it was Soros et the Tides Foundation that did it.  Track the money if you can.  Like In Canada they were there far in advance of the election, and then moved out ahead of the deployment of these systems.  Like in the Ukraine, the infrastructure was set up by Soros.  Then operatives toggled the votes who were aware of these systems.

What now?  IT was an invalid election.  Fix the system and then go again.  I wonder how many races were affected?  I believe it would take two years to get secure systems in place.

Mr Joe Crasharoo

 

As P Trump is once again embroiled in a side issue, the nation is sliding into economic collapse.  there are many people out of work, partially because of C19.  These people cannot afford to pay rent.  There are also many home foreclosures in process.  And food lines.  It was just a week ago I was still being told there is nothing wrong with the economy. 

And what's your answer Joe?  First thing he shall issue executive orders to 1) Regulate the banking system 2) Reform the civil service, and 3) provide a jobs program called the CCC.  Oh wait that was FDR.  No- Joe is going to 1) open borders to unrestrained immigration, and 2) lift the ban on immigration from certain Muslim terror states.

When C19 is over, and many feel that will be when Joe takes over, the economy held up artificially by the Cares Act will collapse also.  Is it possible the people of the nation could have voted for Joe?

Almost certainly, we did not.  The vote was fixed, and not by minorities behind closed doors necessarily.  One sign of who was involved in overthrowing our election, was the ultimatum imposed by 160 companies on P Trump- vacate now, or we will not support Republican candidates in the Georgia election.  This is the sort of thing that does not care about the proper resolution of the election whatever.  Did they car about the election itself?  Would they have rigged the election?  Of course.  the people running these global companies are the enemy of the nation's people.  Joe did not win the election, and he surely knows that.  These people rigged up his win, or are acquiescing to it.  They want the weak leader in office to act as their proxy.  Biden as criminal is a tossaway anytime they want to rid themselves of him.  We might find comical Joe at the bottom of the reflecting pool.

What these companies are offering us is, well, nothing.  They promise a collapse, and ensuing chaos.  Have we been supporting them in the stock market, or through the use of their products?  Perhaps we should stop that.  Visa is one of the companies, the same that corrupted Nancy Pelosi.

We have faced the same process before.  Theodore Roosevelt has to bust the big Trusts, and he did that.  We can do it again.

https://needtoknow.news/2020/11/over-160-business-giants-including-some-who-backed-trump-pressured-him-to-transfer-power-to-biden/ 

Fascism

 

Often it is thought that the Right is the Fascist faction, but no- rather it is the Left.  If you doubt it look to see who is censoring what.  The goal here is to control minds through controlling speech.  If they cannot do that Musk is working on controlling thought using electronic devices.  People on the Right believe in free speech and free will.   

With the the attendant social changes being made the socially violent reaction of ostracization to simple speech is startling and alienating in a country with the first amendment.  Even in Europe people are provoked to laughter because of things like religious totalitarianism that demands nonblasphemous speech by others outside their religion.  This contrast can be dangerous and is alienating to Western minds.

Through circumstances and partially by choice we are mixing very alien cultures.  What is the best way to do this?  The tendency for eastern people is to use social coercion to obtain conformity.  We would see this in the west as Fascism.  We have gone from a largely tolerant society, now to one that tolerates nearly nothing.  Gangs out there enforce their code.  Looking at today's headlines: Ken Jennings of "Jeopardy" is under assault for a wheelchair joke, a school administrator is out because of a homophobic statement, and a major editor of a feminist newspaper is out because the staff confronted her over transphobia.  People's lives ands careers are at stake.  We have lost our sense of humor and bounce.  People are losing their tolerance toward people with differing opinions, to the point of violent outbreaks.

Why are we doing this to ourselves?  WE have smashed alien cultures together leading to a lack of tolerance and we are on the verge of violence.  We have to be afraid that talking might destroy our careers and family.  The rigidity in employment opportunities is leading people to become extremely intolerant.  

Frankly, I have not learned the new pronouns and probably never will.  We are a western nation, and we believe in free speech.  That is our standard.  People who cannot tolerate free speech are guilty of hatred and hate crimes if they act out against the speech of others.  That is how we build tolerance: free speaking and jokes, which are often a friendly way of expositing a cultural contrast.  Like two alienated friends, we adjust to one another based on our understanding of one another.  This is not what happens with intolerance obviously.  Free speech is a bridge, no speech is a barrier.

The Live Exercise

WE all know what a live exericse is: Instead of pretending to fire guns, and run around like you are under attack, soldiers use live ammo, and make the event as close to reality as possible, for the sake of gaining experiential knowledge of the "real" thing. This can happen- becaue the exercise is closed, and it is a simulation, so you really cannot aim to kill someone, right? Instead of a pantomime, they act like it is real. Someone could get shot by accident, so there is that concern as they go through the exercise. An actually real event, would have to entail real combat, real enemies, and real death. that is not permissable. 

 Should it be allowed that the media could report combat taking place, as a report about a live exercise, treating the exercise as real? You could view this as just an extension of the exercise. But the public are not part of combat readiness, right? Should they be compelled to go along, frightened by the media, as though the military attack is real? I would say no. P. Kennedy had children drilled to prepare for a possible nuclear attack. There was a real danger in Cuba, of a possible missile launch. People were frightened, and possibly felt more secure knowing there was a plan of action in case of emergency. BUT this is different than announcing like Orson Wells, that we are under attack. Missiles have been launched. Duck and cover! Thousands have been exposed to radiation they do not know about it. Seek medical assistance if you have the following symptoms... Is that not so? This is more than a live exercise for the sake of preparedness. It involves people that are not part of the exercise by choice, so actually for them it is not an exercise, but the real thing. They might stampede over to emergency rooms, with people being trampled to death. Enemies of the state could actually spread real radiation about in the confusion. All of a sudden the action is real- it is an assault on the public brought on by a "live exercise". Creating real fear in the public arena, is just plain terrorism. They cannot be involved in a preventative exercise like this that intends to terrorize them, and subject them to all the consequences of that. It is against their basic rights to have the government, or any group do that to them. Terror is not needed for preventative drills, It is a way to take away people's rights. 

 What P. Obama did, most presidents would not have done before him- but then he is/was a Muslim, and the guy who gave the Iranians billions of dollars, overlooked Benghazi, praised US traitors like Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, wanted uncontrolled Muslim immigration into the US, etc. Could he have thought like a terrorist when it came to public policy? So, take the New Town school shooting. Although it is not totally clear even now, but it was a live exercise with actors presented to the public as a real shooting. Probably the people involved believed it was for a good purpose - to get the guns out of people's hands, especially AR-15 type weaponry, and to keep weapons away from children, and people with serious mental problems. Also it was a drill, right, so emergency people could act it out, and say they learned something about preventative measures - the use of door locks, of school security measures, there was a discussion of whether teachers should carry, etc. All this could happen without the fright created by the media, treating this as real, right? The use of fright, to scare people into giving up guns - is terrorism. Hollywood/Clinton may have actually organized this, and they implicated Obama in it. 

 The media are the bullets in the guns. How do they decide what they treat as real? Truthfulness in reporting had been goal number one. They wanted to court the public trust, for the sake of their commercial rating. but clearly they have departed from this- away from education as a tool, to overtly representing false events as real, to terrorize the public, for groups like Hollywood, for the Democratic Party, for the banks, for Google, etc. They are on the path to abandonment, as the public now routinely doubts anything they say, and they are often right about questioning the verisimilitude of the media. People no longer want to know if it is true news, they want to know what can be done about this. The media are treating fake events as real- riots, demonstrations, shootings, etc, and ignoring real events like fraudulent voting, the national debt, runaway visas, examining the dysfunction at the FBI and DOJ, and the corruption of public officials.

 Which brings us to the great reset we know as Gate's live exercise: the Pandemic. They appear to have frightened the public into lockdown, destroyed companies and businesses, and made off with trillions of dollars of public money. We are to believe it is because they are listening to Schwab, and imposing rule through fear using this as a device. Guess what? It appears Schwab is a Fascist, right? So who will save us? Could it be, ... the financial industry, and corporations and their backers? Will we run to the UN that has been rearranged by Soros? Who are the real Fascists here? Whoever they are, the last group whose opinion it is that matters is the general public. Someone asked: "What is this all for? How does corporate know which services and products the public wants?" We are seeing ourselves increasingly isolated, powerless, with electrodes in our heads eating largely vegetarian diets, unable to separate virtual reality and real reality. We do not need to escape Earth to go to Mars so the human race survives in the event of a nuclear war. We need to go there to live a life of self-determination, to follow our dreams, and to exhibit our creativity. We need to really seriously consider this. There are more promised catastrophes awaiting us. We are having the Pandemic exercise now, and tomorrow we have the EMP catastrophe, and the cyberattack catastrophe.  Are we prepared?

Are the Tides Turning?

 A report on the conjunction of Soros' Tides Foundation, and Dominion, shows vote fixing is possibly part of an international process serving the globalists, specifically the World Economic Forum.  So, this is rather big news.  Globalists fixed the vote in our national election.

So the question is: "What are we going to do about this?".  Isn't it a direct assault on our country?  They would seem to be the enemies of democracy everywhere.  The obvious thing to do is to infiltrate their organization and destroy it.  What are the chances?

The name Dominion harkens back to its use in religion, and our "Lord's Dominion".  They are declaring their goal is to utterly dominate the globe.  How many smaller races have they already fixed, judgeships, mayors, Congressmen, etc?

Too bad Julian Assange is not out and about.  He could have have the whole nine yards, the fumblers unable to get a handle on much of anything.  Could be why he doesn't have access to a keyboard.

Therapy to overcome Homosexual attraction

Would this human be better off if he had Conversion Therapy?

 

Members of the extreme left are upset that two Trump appointed judges have determined that conversion therapy is not illegal.  This is according to the first amendment, the right to religion, and the state shall not interfere.  A good example is a priest who has same sex attraction, who wants to get over it so he can be a good priest, should have the right to find professionals who can help him.  The same is true for an individual who wishes to just change his orientation so he can identify differently.  Should counseling be denied to these people, to force them in one way or another? 

There was a woman connected with Howard University who identified as Black, although racially she was white.  If she sought conversion therapy to be white, should it be denied?  Should Blacks all scream- it is racial bigotry in action here?  Are they are trying to kill Aunt Jemimah?  If she is coaxed to convert then does this not harm her Aunt Jemimah soul?

Often under consideration is a child who has been molested, who has been abused by someone who somehow gained influence over the individual.  How could anyone deny them therapy to reverse the brainwashing they incurred?  What this might involve could by anything, including sexually corrupting the child.  For this reason, and because parents might deem it important for their child, in the child's own interest,  to undergo conversion therapy, shouldn't that approach be available to them?  

Legal proceedings are one thing.  They involve clashes between opposing groups, or are synthetic- created for the sake of argument.  In reality, however, you can always find a therapist willing to help a child, to overcome tendencies harmful to them, or to help with conversion as they transition from one situation to another.   It may not be called sexual conversion therapy but it is there to be found.  It is great to see this- to actually have the legal right to acquire therapy.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2020/11/20/trump-judges-strike-down-bans-on-lgbtq-conversion-therapy/?sh=530dd22e3d7e

Urban Safety

 

There was a time you could walk down the street, and all you had to think about was identifying a pleasant smell emanating from somewhere.  After 9/11 this changed.  Smells created worries- "what is that?"  C19 is no different.  People are afraid elements exist in the environment, in products, sprayed on food, and possibly sprayed on the seats of mass transport, that could be endangering our health.  We faced ecoli problems from transported foods.  Internal social tension is making people afraid.  There exist many foreign elements, people who are our enemies who live among us.  There are many products in our country, that are made in foreign places, by people who do not know what noxious or dangerous materials are. and of they know, they do not care.

Do you recall the day that Ralph Nader led the way to Consumer Protection?  We do not hear much of that anymore.  Starting about 1995, consumer protection became a concern of the individual consumer.  You could go into Walmart or Kmart and see products with banned ingredients.  No one was telling you about it.  If dangerous elements were to be found in the subway, who would tell you?  The medical system is poor at recognizing environmentally dangerous substances, tending to interpret everything as biological. Many public health organizations these days, do not even measure lead in your water, even though they know aged inlet pipes exist with lead jointing.

Of recent concern is the recognition that many C19 symptoms could be explained by radiation exposure.  The extreme hypoxia could be explained by damaged red blood cells, and pneumonia induced by ionizing radiation.  Are we being poisoned by enemies of our state?  Is it possible food is being sprayed in supermarkets with radioactive materials? In the past we worried about gaseous atmospheric clouds of radiation, and later the possibility of dirty bombs, and now perhaps we should worry about micro-exposures.  there is also a long list of drugs and substances that can cause hemolytic anemia, like arsenic, various metals, Nitrofurantoin(used to fight urinary infections), and anti-malarial drugs. 

Beginning in March of this year, radiation specialists are reporting widespread signs of radiation distress in people, not dissimilar to damage from xrays or radiative cancer therapy.  The second wave of C19 they believe is natural, but they think the first wave may have been caused partially by radiation releases.  If this was the case would our government know?  IF they did would they tell us?

Instead of relaxing monitoring, and ignoring public health issues, perhaps we should do the opposite: be more vigilant.  We are in the mode that such vigilance is just an unnecessary cost.  We wait until there is a problem, and then address it.  We have seen how this C19 event has wrecked havoc with our economy.  Proactive concern could have kept this damage to a minimum. Without it, we may not even know what hit us.  WE have not improved the technological sophistication of our methods to keep up with the potential hazards.  We do not even have an accurate C19 test.

The Great Ripoff is Coming, may be already here

Many people are worried about increases in taxes, for that is a levy directly from your bank account to the government.  The government can take in other ways: through direct imposition of eminent domain, or through using condemnation laws.  This is the direct taking of your property, rescinding your rights to ownership.  The ability to control the things you need in life is a big part of your individual rights.  When there is a squabble over how you use things you own, or lease and this gets taken to court, it is existing law that applies, but some people are ignoring the existing laws that guarantee people basic rights, and as a consequence they are being lost.  Does the government refer to existing law in making decisions, or are they just imposing an ad hoc set of rules communicated to them by legislators, or by companies?

 WE have seen the slip: the FBI not knowing what to investigate, the DOJ enforcing some laws, but not others.  The laws on the books being ignored are increasing day to day.  Many will be surprised when they learn impositions upon them, leave them without recourse for the rights they believed they had, actually no longer exist even though they do in law.

The way our government works, is that legislators maintain the laws that are to be enforced.   They can update any laws, rescind a law or a body of laws, or create new laws. So if they intend to take away certain public protections, they would need to change the law in a fashion to accommodate these wishes. This requires the assent of the governing body, and in some cases would require changes to the Constitution in the form of an amendment which would require the assent of all the states.  When they short-circuit this process like they did with border enforcement, they take away the right of the electorate to have a voice.   There is no assent of the states, there is no motion in Congress, and so the changes are imposed regardless of whom you have elected.  And what did they do?  How have they changed things?  Well, if your property rights are being stolen, they do not really care to broadcast that to you.  The changes these people impose are invisible until you encounter them in some way.  

They still publish the law, and lawyers supposedly have fat books full of them, and case histories to which they refer, BUT why bother with all that if a call from a legislator or a company ignores all that and they are the defacto "rule of law"?  Why publish laws for people to read, believing it gives them rights they actually do not possess?  What good is a lawyer to you?

These activities are part of the "Economic Reset", ushered in by the C19 virus.  the World Economic Forum (WEF)  hopes to complete the reset by 2030.  It began by locking you down, and it will not get better.  They intend to take away all your rights, by taking all your ownership rights- basically stealing what you own.  You will have to request food preparation utensils, just to make your dinner.  People can use your living room when you are not there- but you may be making the home payments. You might be incredulous, but it is being planned and in some locations placed into operation off the books.

forbes article

Outside the system

 

AS people internationalized, more and more control by national governments has slipped.  To control international corporate entities supposedly you need a global government.  I think this would be impossible- that national governments are already too large for checks and balances to work.  Over time even our state governments have stopped imposing their standards to the point many people feel the government no longer supports them, but instead just certain factions, often business factions rather than protect the rights of the general citizenry.  Often laws are not enforced, staffing is not provided, and there is no oversight.  Government people are connected to the people they are supposed to monitor and control.

Do we need a red scare?  Maybe something more strident?  Because of open borders and openness to foreign people getting into business and government, the ticket often being a degree or a visa, people have systematically infiltrated our country.  We have too much foreign/antinational/international  influence in the country and it is hard for it to function this way.  Not only that but it is Communist/Socialist and totalitarian.    IT is Soros.  Soros has tumbled other nations, and as people have pointed out- he does it in democratic nations through infiltration by his agents, often Jewish, and corrupts the vote.  This is how he is trying to take over the Ukraine.  His agents there are from Canada, and New Jersey.  Is Soros' money, and big tech's know how corrupting our country?  Soros targets government positions, media, and is not shy about activities like his hedge fund actions- starting up companies just for the sake creating a false impression- like fact checking companies.  These companies come and go.  He targets sensitive elections, often judgeships.  He has placed people into almost all Democratically held state governments.  He keeps working month after month, year after year to corrupt and overthrow a nation.  

This is where we have been at, with the riots, the C19 situation, and voter fraud.  With the riots, the police did not arrest people, because the judges for some reason would not convict anyone of looting, or destruction of property.  Why was that?  We seem to have a shortage of people who do the right thing.  If they could not convict an arsonist, or people who murdered someone by kicking in their head, how do you suppose these same people can handle the vote?  Wouldn't you expect if serious shenanigans were going on, they would just say "Defund the overseers!", or a judge saying: "We will not convict anyone connected with voter fraud."?  There is a ton of evidence of wrongdoing in the election.  Can this be brought to court, and properly adjudicated?  All they have talked about so far is an accounting showing registrations for ballots.  There probably are 100s of thousands or more, of bad registrations.  There would have to be since there were truckloads of ballots brought in to some locations.  What's more, the people doing the accounting are the same people who oversaw the original vote.  If they changed numbers using Dominion servers for example, they could just lie about there being corresponding ballots and registrations.  That is one thing P. Trump might do: see how many illegals voted by using the census.  Oops, it does not distinguish in this census, although that is one of its main purposes.  He said he could use other means. Well, did he?  If he did, then he can pick a place and tell you how many illegals voted and were registered.  There were many 100s of thousands, maybe millions of fake papers sent here by the Chinese.  Did anyone complain?  Was anyone arrested for acquiring false papers?

Why wasn't more done before the election?  Why did they go ahead with the election when they knew there were all kinds of problems?  Now it looks like P. Trump may spend the remainder of this term with another pile of BS rather than forward any programs.  If he prevails they will possibly have prepared another assault on his office.  He is either almost totally powerless (which he is really not), or perhaps he remains in office to assuage the Saints of Killers, all those who believe in distinguishing right and wrong, good and evil, and are willing to back it up with a Bible verse and a gun; until such a time the steam as measured by social media goes out of their sails.  For all appearances, P. Trump is still needed for this purpose, even though he constrained the availability of bullets (must be depots of bullets?).  For all appearances he presides as the Commies are setting up.  Strange isn't it he has not confronted them?  Day after day they are corrupting the national scene, our media, etc, and he has yet to go after anyone, or to stop the ongoing encroachment.  If Soros is paying people to organize riots, can they not be confronted?

What I am saying here, is that if P. Trump does not fight the corrupters and solicit assistance, he can never win.  He has to go on the offensive and stop/disrupt the organization of the anti-US corrupters.  There is another way to compel his agenda, and the people's desires.  Rather than fight the tassel-topped people paid by these operatives, why not directly place a monkey wrench into Commie plans?  P. Trump is chasing their tails here, rather than going after the heads.  If politics are not the answer, there are other answers.  I would think if elections are impossible because outside forces are corrupting our process, serious repercussions almost must follow.  We are talking about the country here, and our democracy.

If P. Trump does not win, then I would imagine we might see underground militias form, that may disrupt tassel-topped people's initiatives.  We are talking about the better half of our society, that will almost undoubtedly resist.  They have already done so, against Clinton.  This situation is far worse.

Biden is disqualified!

 

Even before P. Trump took office, he was attacked.  This has never happened before.  He has been assailed ever since.  Can he reverse the constant pummeling long enough to ascertain the corruption in this election, and arrest the main perpetrators?

There is plentiful evidence of serious corruption, and it is not of the variety of someone filling out two ballots instead on one, kind.  IF so a recount would not change the vote tally. But that is beside the point, for serious fraud occurred, like counting ballots for day when it was impermissible.  We are facing widespread corruption people with boxes of ballots adding them in after Nov 3.  It is like what occurred with the bricks, prior to the rioting, showing it was organized, and centrally funded.  Biden leads, then voting at polls placed P Trump in the lead, and then after the election Biden kept accumulating more votes until he won, but there was no reason for the swing back for Biden.  Why would this arise?

Biden acted like a buffoon throughout the campaign.  He acted like a gunslinger.  He sat back and waited for the tally to go his way, and when it did he declared himself winner.  He dared P Trump to prove otherwise.  Were Soros' goons already deployed?  On the payroll?  Soros works in a way similar to the Chinese- he just keeps pressuring people out of positions, and moving his Jewish friends in to take their place.  Over time he can corrupt key positions in a way that supports his plans.  His squads have done the same thing in elections in other places.  His people are intimidating the lawyers who are examining the election fraud.  Threats are being made, statements to the effect they will lose their license and never practice again.  They are moving aggressively, trying to prevent an actual examination of the situation.  It is similar to what Mueller did, to prevent P Trump from adjudicating any cases while he was being investigated.  There must be a significant panic on the Left, and possibly fear of incarceration.  This might include the Clintons, Pelosi, Kerry, and the Bidens,  Did Soros take his Antifa riot inciters and change them into hauling bails of ballots around?  Were they also involved with staging events at hospitals in connection with C19?  It is the government's normal job to handle these situations typically by the CIA, the FBI, and the DOJ. Can they handle this?  Are they compromised to the point an examination of the vote is difficult?  Will they find some new front on which to assault P Trump so he has difficulty investigating the election?

There is a point the vote is so messed, you must actually concede it was crazy to hold an election.  There were riots involving foreign groups.  We knew they were externally funded by people trying to overthrow our government.  They were not tracked or apprehended, at least not much to my knowledge, even though they have been operating in this country probably for four years.  If a group penetrates into our country, even our voting polls, to the point they will not let anyone in to see what they are doing- isn't that an invalid election?  This is not a court case.  

We need to take the offensive with those who are attacking our institutions, our businesses, and taking over our streets.  We can predict this from patterns adopted by the color revolutions elsewhere. The enemy is here.  People see it.  Why can't our government?  If Russians were blazing our election polls you would stop the election, right?  We just had people trying to set the White House ablaze and they are still running around the country.

ID: Soros.  How hard is that?  Where is our surveillance on him?  Where is the tracking on his agents, and the people he has placed in our government?  Shouldn't he be considered to be at least as bad as bin Ladin?

 And Biden- didn't he educe all the voting fraud?  He is not fit to be dog catcher in this country.

   https://twitter.com/i/status/1326323889417322497

Underground Press?

 

People who have been freely posting on the web, until they have been cutoff, have tolerated the censorship, but now they sense two things: 1) the internet is a trap- a commercial entity not for public utility, but really a venue provided by a company who can cut you off in an instant, including the government, and 2)  it is potentially dangerous for people to use it.  According to one social media leader: "People can live without it.  Its really not such a big deal."

The first item has been demonstrated with the election.  People were shut off many company platforms.  Companies used excuses to cut people off, and imposed censorship.  So the ability to express yourself can be manipulated, and just when you need it most- zap, it is gone.  Imagine if they shut off your telephone service so you could not talk to anyone, or only allowed you to say certain things on your telephone.  That is possible these days.  It could happen.  This makes you wonder if you didn't like your old analog phone better.  Maybe P-mail is better than E-mail too.  Post Office: Can you provide secure p-internet services that are secure for users?  No intervention.  No monitoring.  Colorblind, and politically neutral?  At first we could settle just for secure electronic P-mail no one can read but the recipient, and any tampering will result in stiff penalties, just like intentionally opening someone's mail.

IT has always overshadowed the internet, that you could place a photo out there, and the next thing you know- you have a stalker.  This has caused many people just to use the internet to show their pets.  My doggie is a cute Dobermann Pincer.  Isn't he sweet?   No- usually they are like little fluff balls below the knee in height.  Beyond personal disputes in a public forum being a problem, there is the problem of recording your activities and potentially using them against you.   This can be quite innocent on your part, but you express yourself, and someone brings this to the attention of someone who hates that opinion and they can make enemies for you.  Not only that, since it is recorded - a political faction can use this information and determine you are a foe, like Occasional-Cortex expressed recently to create blacklists of people and rub them out.  If you wanted to form the Republican Party today using the Internet - you might be placed on a hit list.  In a recent attempt to recall Governor Evers here in WI which should have been an easy thing to do considering state sentiments regarding the lockdown, this failed possibly because using the Internet Ever's supporters might have interfered because they knew where people would meet to collect signatures, etc.

Could the Internet serve as a form of expression for public opinion?  As an alternate grass roots news service?  Could it be a way to publish a pamphlet to people telling them to beware of this and that?  As it is, no.  We have seen in fact companies have taken over the Internet, and they censor traffic.  They also can cut you off.  When something is not going right, that is when you need the service.  That is also the point at which you get switched off- just like they smashed your little printing press in the past.  Corporations and International groups have taken over the free net, and it is no longer free, and it is no longer national either.

What can be done to maintain a free press?  Go Dark.  WE might have to go into the dark night.  WE could encrypt everything so it is not readable unless you have a decrypter.  This would be content blind communications.  Not too social but it would get passed through the net.

Would it be possible to recover the Internet we knew and loved, before it was usurped by Google?  IT might be possible to change Al Gore's Internet, to make it the IWKL Internet by changing the packet protocol.  By using the same net but changing the packet protocols they would be unrecognized by standard internet services, but passed to computers that could decipher the information.  Thus the same addressing and communications channels could be used.  Al that needs to be done is to demand a certain bandwidth for IWKL-net be provided, as a legal requirement.  This net could be  national, and secure from intervention by hostile digital groups like Google.  All memory of your communications would be short lived, and zero unless it is necessary.  You would also need a network card that speaks to IWKL-net.

So if getting the big tech Internet companies to meet our expectations is too difficult, perhaps competition in this arena would provide an alternative.  Let the people decide what they prefer.  All that is required is a little hardware, and bandwidth from the existing system (which they should supply in lieu of the fact they have been breaking the rules and public expectations for years for which they have a remarkable amount of cash).

What's with the Main stream Media?

 Just imagine you groomed yourself, starved yourself, and this increased your personal esteem, and then someone told you that you are no longer needed?

Blech... right?  High 6 figures, and 7 figures.  Man, I am worth it.  Don Lemon - $4M.  He could cry like a little sissy at the idea he is no longer wanted.  What is he going to do?  CNN salaries are fairly high, and for what?  Well - presenting fake news.

The MSM are really largely redundant, and propaganda outlets.  the political people on both sides see the press as unnecessary.  the Left because if they are in office, and probably would be without the MSM, would no longer need all those relic networks.  the Right because they were entirely alienated by the MSM, would like to see them jump into the ocean.  P. Trump said, just before the election he would like to start up new news services and get rid of all of them.  In return they called several states early and spread rumors that they knew Trump would lose - the fix was in.

Expect consolidation.  Who will survive?  Well, Lemon put on a performance Jimmy Swaggert would have enjoyed.  He was betting all those minorities would cry out to see him on the air again.  This situation, may present us with more entertainment like this- the best so far they have had to offer in years.  It is like Real TV.

Lets come together, right now!

 

Sleepy Joe woke to believing in national unity, although he thinks there is no nation when he is actually fully awake.  At least I think he does.  He wants unity.  Okay, starting right now- lets place Hunter and Hillary front and center, along with all the evidence, and see what they did and if that is okay, and whether or not they broke laws.   WE need to restore the Dept. of State, among other departments.

Lets look over the election results together, right now.  Should have before, but then they locked observers out.  Together, we need a plan to secure our elections.  Lets work on that, now.

  Biden might start with trying to get himself together: is there a nation?  What is he president of, in his own mind?

Biden Pre-Impeachment

Many people now realize who Joe Biden is, and say they would like to change their vote from him to Trump.  So of the miniscule number of votes he actually got, and there must have been some, if people were allowed to change their vote based on new information, he would even have fewer votes.

The lockdown he says he will implement upon getting into office-  is unconstitutional.  For that he should be pre-impeached- disqualified, or simply nullified.  What kind of president would lock people down, destroying their livelihoods, when the threat of the virus to them is miniscule? Would people vote for someone like that if they understood this?  The next Socialistic step is to find a way to eliminate those who are unsupported.  Who could get elected on that?  It appears Joe is more like a foreign agent, maybe from China.  C19 is the reason your are locked down, and C19 eventually in lockdown will kill lots of people.

What is next?  Maybe because of global warming he will force our petroleum companies to give gasoline to Africans, and to ration ours.  Good deal.  We must stop that global warming.

Socialism is imposed!

 Would you elect people who told you they intended to push for a 1-child policy?

If you ask the Chinese, that was smart- the 1-child policy.  Undoubtably they have an enormous population problem, and since the collapse of fishing in the Pacific, they have a food supply problem.  That we helped them with that, through pretending a problem with scabies, and have allowed them to buy food companies here in the West, is good.  But at the point we begin to socialize to solve their problems, it is bad.

People were lured into socialism, by telling them they would obtain freebees.  People like Biden took bribes.  When people rioted and stole stuff out of stores, they felt better, as long as they get their freebees they will be okay.  Biden told them- hey man, good for you.  Immediately they wanted Biden for president.  Biden tells the world to send us their problems.  He is now hauling out his grandkids, as the crony he is.  He has the solutions.

Well, let me tell you,  the first solution has already been imposed.  It is C19.  It is a socialist solution.  The public health reaction was to follow the lockdown policy of the Chinese(?), guaranteed everyone gets it, and in every country.  Bad Trump for imposing travel restrictions.  They will now delay the vaccine, to make sure they have culled the herd, as planned.  And when the state wants you to take your medicine, you are going to take it, right? They brought it, we took it - just like they brought the rigged up election using people dedicated to freebees.  Hey, let me say- those coloreds will have a rude awakening soon, as will we all as "global" solutions are imposed on us.  The solution to the political problem- was to use corporations and foreign countries, to say they did this.  We had nothing to do with it.  Would you vote for Biden if he told you "I'm for C19, lockem down!"?

Another social solution is abortion- quick, easy, and with no social stigma.  Another social solution is homosexuality- a measure that is always proposed by eager socialists, and always a bad option.  Another solution is to use the medical system to speed death. "Do not chew your vicodin tablet", was the start.  We have a problem with opiates.  Hey man, do we have a problem with opiates? WE need a solution for pain, man.  In  a medical system like this, not pledged to health or pro-life, hey man, you better have yourself a doc you can trust.  What's the deal if you suffer from malpractice, a lack of proper diagnosis and care, or if they lose your records?  Hey man, there's no problem.  Would you kiss Joan Rivers?  I would suppose Chinese medicine is "good", howsa about some tea for what ails you?

Will they bring the 1-child policy back?  Maybe, but it probably will be equal.

Biden games the system- asks to be declared Winner

 This has never happened before.   There were many close races, included PA.  Undoubtably there were many irregularities, and Biden's goal was just to shush all that, compel ignoring that, and be declared the winner.  He did this by making his speech last night, and asking the news services to declare him the winner.   And they did this, and astroturf is attempting to incite reactions of joy now that he is elected.

Will they wait until Jan 20? 

Actually Biden is not the president-elect, and Pennsylvania is not settled.  Hold the confetti.  This is fake news, probably with paid actors.  Biden says one thing: Unity, I am all for Unity, and then ... he aggressively tells Trump to get lost before the counting and evaluations are done.  They told Biden beforehand not to make the speech.  He done dooed it anyway.  The best thing you can say is: Biden is not in charge, but this is actually all orchestrated.

There are at least 5 states in which there is the appearance a few thousands of votes were generated, or added.  It is widely believed this was done in many states.  Biden does not want the horrid process examined, for if it is: ugly demons will crawl forth from the darkness.  This is bound to be true because of the knuckleheads that were involved.

I hate dumbo's tie too.  He is talking to Soros there, telling him game on, we're doing business again in the Ukraine, and lowering the living standard of the US.  He is telling Clinton to cancel the castle in the UK.  

 

Whats the bid, Biden?

 

How much to get the federal contract?  Biden has proved he will take a bribe.  Suddenly he is running for office.  We all know, how those third world countries are.  So I'll bet Joe is already on the horn, talking to his foreign contacts and potentially making deals for himself and family.  But, is the Donald listening?  IS he unmasking?  Biden is no longer a candidate.  Is he under surveillance?

I'll bet he is not.

What about Hillary?  She is not a candidate.  IS she under surveillance?  Probably not.  Does she still have her security clearance?  Did the FISA court give a warrant to P Trump to monitor her activities?  After all she is guilty of 100's if not a thousand security breaches.  She should have been monitored, right?

Crime?

IT looks like criminals are running the country.  No authoritarianism.  No leaders in the country with the courage to stop the bad guy.  Only Rittenhouse.  The police are standing on their hands.  I had a horrible upbringing, but I picked myself up by my bootstraps, and I hate the criminals that got away with harming me, and now I hate criminals.

Are we going to let criminals drive us bats? 

COVID COMPOSITION

The composite situation wrt C19, is : Bill Gates declared early on that HCQ was not a cure, and everyone would have to wait for a vaccine, and this could take several years.  The lockdown strategy employed guarantees exposure by almost everyone eventually.  Another strategy would have been to quarantine people in regions of high initial exposure to prevent it from spreading.  This is not done.  The president tried to quarantine New York, and was chastised and threatened by Cuomo - allowing it to spread.

HCQ was taken up by the Administration.  Supplies were sought and found in India, and the administration was going to buy a large amount of this.  Current  status:  The FDA stated HCQ was ineffective as a cure, and that is should not be prescribed.  However, if the drug is available and you can find a doctor who will prescribe it, you can still use it.  However, doctors have been intimidated by the way a small group from LA was treated, speaking out about the value of HCQ use.  The lesson taught here is your license to practice could be revoked, and surely you could be fired.  So, final analysis here is you might get a prescription, but quite likely not.   This backs largely what Bill Gates said.

What about remdesivir?  The president purchased large amounts of this.  At almost the same time and also earlier, it was already known to be ineffective - but a cashcow for Gilead - and the president went ahead with the purchase regardless.  You could be prescribed remdesivir but it will not help you.

So like Gates said.  What about a vaccine then?  Well, quite possibly China, Israel,  and maybe we had one before the outbreak. Since C19 was experimentally used by several groups before the outbreak, and specifically used in Gain-of-Function *(GOF) studies, they have access to earlier mutations that were relatively harmless, and these could have been usable as a vaccine.  IF this is true, then as people had earlier stated: Gates seems to have planned the outbreak, and he seems to be aware of, or has himself the vaccine ahead of time.  No one has discussed the GOF studies, and that they were transferred to China when a moratorium on them was emplaced in the US because this process is the same one a research group would use to produce a bioweapon.  So who is doing bioweapon research?  China, Israel, Japan, and the US.  This transfer of technology to China, is exactly like giving them the design plans for MERVing nuclear missile warheads.  It was done by people who had no security concerns.  The academic culture, and Obama, share this sentimentality, perhaps thinking China might use the technology on its own people.

Was there a global plan to expose everyone to C19?  Exposure means a fraction of the elderly and obese will die.  This is a possible way to reduce global population.  Who is mostly at risk?  Blacks, and Hispanics seem to have a genetic predisposition to serious illness, whereas Hindus and Orientals do not.  Was this a designer organism of a racial nature?  If so, it seems to advantage Asians.

Are people getting C19?  We have many tests that seem to indicate this is so.  We know something like viral pneumonia is going around, also colds and flu.  Most likely these things are spread in people's homes, although they pick it up getting groceries.  The controlled delivery of groceries would seem to be a way to impose a wall on its spread.  Doctors treat, often making assumptions about what you have.  They do not bother to actually test to see if this is A or B.  They did in the past examine cultures to examine bacterial infections, but never have they used E-microscopic examination with viruses. With C19 they have imposed testing- but genetic and chemical.   They wanted doctors for the first time, to extensively test - but these tests do not necessarily detect only C19, and it was known PCR testing has many false positives for any virus - perhaps 40% !!  The quick test has many false positives also.  No one has proposed  E-microscopic examination with viruses.  Only bio-researchers use this technology.  No one has recovered a C19 virus from a body, and examined it on a microscope to definitively say someone had C19.  There seems to be a conspiracy here that can deny any infection whatever. 

IF you are well, but afraid you could get C19, then you might stay at home and eat less.  A plus for China. So you are ill, running a fever, and having some trouble getting oxygen into your body- you could stay at home and wait for it to pass (with a fairly high probably of recovery although you would not know if you even have C19).  If you go to a clinic you would probably be tested, and could get a false positive test.  If you have moderate symptoms you may be hospitalized and never talk to anyone you know ever again.  What are they telling your doctor?  What about those end-of-life decisions if you are lying upside down and on respirator?  What does that doctor from Nigeria think about your case?

IF you are hospitalized, ... you may be exposed by staff to diseases including C19.  They cannot cure you.  If you are placed on a respirator they say you will likely die.  So... since they will not prescribe HCQ, and have no other effective therapeutics, should you bother with the medical system?  Perhaps you are better off just staying home.  At least you are under your own control.

We are seeing the collective results of all parties in this situation.  Congress is responsible for removing HCQ from treatments.  The medical system is responsible for its complicity, and the inappropriate use of test technology that doesn't work.  Clearly leftists had an insensitivity toward killing people off, and eventually they controlled what the president said and did.  They reinforced the lockdown strategy that spread the virus everywhere. The transfer of technology to China, has allowed them to use it as a low-grade bioweapon - not accidentally released, but intentionally spread to the US.  As for Gates, who knows what he said to whom, and who he controls.  He has too much power, and no oversight.  Most likely he is aware of situation, and hey, why let a crisis go to waste, you know?

Was there a globalist plan to cull the herd?  Could be.  If effect, that is what we have going on, especially for Blacks, and Hispanics.  As Christians, we never could have accepted any such planning, but global thinking is obviously different.  They dislike armies, but the individual is a peon.  How do you fight the World Economic Forum and the UN, if they are responsible for this virus, and its propagation? Should you go to the hospital for treatment?  I leave that up to you.

Rioters and Villons want Biden, and say they voted properly

According to savvy people on the Right, it is a fact that states with Democratic governors. especially those that promoted lockdowns and rioting, are also trying just NOW, to concoct ballots for Biden, to cover up the fact that P. Trump won.  We are talking PA. AZ, NV, MI, WI, MN, and possibly VA and NC.

The question is what states to you select to examine?  

 In WI there was an early lead for Biden, then a swing back toward P. Trump.  If there was then, after Nov 3, a bundle of votes nearly all for Biden that tipped the balances back toward Biden, wouldn't that be suspicious?  In some venues, this is doubtlessly the case - as in NV.

What about the places that rioters destroyed records?  Who can abide the influence of these lawless brigands, who would support Biden, just so they can commit crimes without police enforcement?

COVID Conservatives

 

Here we are.  If we felt powerless during the Trump administration, all that time not prosecuting but enduring Jeff Sessions, etc. we can now look forward to P Trump re-evaluating the election probably until January.  Power to the ******.

We have also endured Joe Biden, possibly the worst candidate in the history of the nation.  The awful slap in the face is that if he got elected then the candidate made absolutely no difference.  A candidate could have shit on the ground, screwed a child onstage, and given the public the finger while pointing out his party's election fraud, and still be elected.  That is not how our elections are supposed to work.  Joe actually showed us - he could not even remember his name, and that way, he would still get elected because the fraud out there was out of control.  Will anyone remember his name after he gets into the White House?  I mean it is possible he was being held hostage, or being blackmailed.

President Trump's justice department, managed to convict 1 lawyer for signing someone else's name, and as they announced Durham was stalled, they told us there was nothing wrong with Obama's unmasking.  This leads you to think they were working hardest on exonerating spying on another candidate than anything else.  the laws that were created to stop terrorism, can be used against anyone, for anything.  Do they stop at only examining people with suspicious foreign linkages, or do they illegally and without hesitation spy on whomever piques their interest?  There is clear evidence this is so- people who were spied upon, as members of the press, and there is no accounting for others who may have had their hard drives destroyed remotely just out of someone's personal spite.  This is a slip in our rights - anyone can spy on us apparently and get away with it.  What rights have we if we elect people who disrespect our constitution?  You might ask them.  Someone answered by saying they would discuss anything and decide together what rights we have.  This means actually we have no rights.  What is the Dept of Justice then doing?  Or the FBI, or the Supreme Court?  Are we to believe that we voted away our rights too?  This would be the first time in the history of the world people did not care about the protections of the Magna Carta.

WE might also wonder about the Latinos in Florida.  Notice we never hardly heard a word by anyone about their involvement in the COVID-19 crisis, in the 2016 elections, about their illegal voting in many of our larger cities, but now what is being reported is they tried to help P. Trump win.  Not that they are stuffing ballots mind you.  Not that they participated in the fake hospital surges of C19 cases. not that they participated in riots, kicking in people's heads.  What we hear is they tried to help P. Trump.  This is so corny, even Pravda would not have gone with that story.

A corrupted press is a bad thing for an election.  They never mentioned voter fraud concerns, never investigated anything.  They did not investigate Biden, or express concerns about spying on P. Trump.  Never complained about corrupt politicians taking money.  They did not seem that concerned about Hillary Clinton and probably an uncountable number of violations regarding pay-for-play, and exposure of classified information.  What they did do was present many fake stories to the public as though they were accurate.  Almost surely Biden did lose, but the story is: He won.  That is what the committee wanted, whoever they are.  We do not even know who they are.  Like a bad boss they simply throw your good results out, and promote the guy he wants - probably his son-in-law.  

What did we elect if not Bad Joe?  The committee may have decided, maybe not.  We appear to have elected a global consensus, the American public after being wrung out, is being put out to dry.  The game is to have you relent, give up, no Bibles and Guns with bullets.  You still angry out there?  We give you the Senate for the time being, maybe not next time.  They want you to disown your real American family and its traditions, without firing a shot.  They have this calculation down pat, just like a card counter.

Election is Over: Now what?

 

Well, President Trump is still in office.

  That means it is possible for him to address all the voter fraud the Man Joe has talked about.  The expectation has been met.  Just as the IRS was immediately used to remove organizations opposed to Obama, and now Twitter, Google, and Facebook are opposed to anyone against Biden, and just as they drummed up a fake investigation by Mueller, and also a fake impeachment, could we expect the radical idiots in the streets to vote straight when even Joe has a senior Freudian sip and reveals the existence of the largest voter fraud organization ever.  Saying Joe has a Freudian slip is not a cliché, for everything about Biden is a cliché.  The fraud is large, and was leading up to the 2016 election.  It would have been nice to get a victory nonetheless, straightup, but perhaps this time that is not how it is.  Will they actually have to address the fraud?  They will, unless they relent and let this mob remove the president through voter fraud.

Everyone is talking about those mail-in ballots.  

Who makes reality?

 As a youth I was told of the crazy way the eskimo lives, travelling as a band, the chief making up stories as they go along, to entertain and control his band.  Whatever the chief says has to be believed by the band.  The chief creates their reality, and this might radically change from day to day, as if with no continuity.

I thought about how crazy this is.  It reminded me of the Man of LaMancha, who made up his own reality.  At least Don Quixote's vision had continuity.  But I was thinking about all these fake events and fake news created by people to make you believe things - and they are doing what the eskimo chief does.    There is the loss of truth, something if up, they say down, you see something left, and they see something right.  There is no truth, only someone's story. Schools are shot up, airplanes are flown into buildings, nightclubs ae shot up, diseases spread ... all stories.  Are they our reality, or this there some other actual truth?  Are we to accept the stories even though we may not believe they are true, for fear of reprisals from the story tellers?

Bill Clinton asked us "What is is?" Can you perjure yourself if your stories are reality?  He is placing himself in the eskimo chief's seat.  When you realize this is what is going on, then you see he thinks he is above law - he is the law - and there is no truth.  How can there be law if there is no truth?  a coherent reality requires respect for the truth, and hence all our rights are dependent on a a realization of truthfulness.  All knowledge also depends on truth.  

It is from God, we have truth.  Initially people believed in what happened in heaven as Truth, and everything else, well, was relative, contrived, and synthetic.  Real truth was evasive on earth.  We are reminded of Bruno, who claimed he saw a flash on the moon, and he was labelled a heretic by the church for it dispelled the stories the church had of permanence in  the heavens.  Yet it is only through God, we can rise above the human story telling, and find truth.  I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life(John14.2).  To see what "is", you have to have a sense of detachment, and from this perspective of the mind's eye, we can use the constructs we have to understand what we see.  The storyteller spins his tales, as the egotist he can only wildly use his imagination.  He has no respect for rights, for he can dream up anything, possibly just to amuse himself, or escape blame.  The arrow of Truth points to the good way, and by definition it shatters the internectine human constructions in its way.