Wednesday, December 30, 2020

What have we learned about disease?


What we have seen is the spread of C19 disease around the globe.  If this were a bad germ communicated similarly, there could be as many as 100M dead by now- like a hydrogen bomb launched in a populated area.  Since most people had minor symptoms, it was possible for C19 to spread around before it was noticed.  As a consequence how it initially spread is in doubt, but it seems to have been vectored through medical supplies probably made in China, as well as by international travelers.  What came from China, did not stay in China, as is usual.  China's social program to control disease, obviously is failed, along with trying to control the use of bubble gum.

Initially, testing was not in place.  To track a disease you would need testing all the time.  You go to the doctor, he takes a sample, and you find out you have X with a probability of Y.  This process currently is not simple, but a little research program every time they encounter a new bug.  New technology here is needed.  It is very bad to have tests that take too long for a result, or that give too many false positives.  You could get very sick before you knew it was C19.  Also there was always a fairly high probability (40%) that you didn't have C19 but the test was returned positive.

Logistically, how did authorities handle this?  Very poorly.  People pretended to have crowded hospitals,  mayors refused emergency measures - placing patients into nursing homes- and now they are placing nursing home patients into hospitals. The goal early on, was to create the lockdown condition for some, which was successful, actually a surprise to them.  Later they tried to implement a plan to contact trace, which was a fiasco.  People believed external control was basically to implement  a plan to control disease, so they complied.  If they had known they were being manipulated, no doubt it would have been different.  They rebelled- went out of lockdown saying it was unconstitutional to restrain their movements.  They did not comply with contact tracers.  Most were unaffected really by C19 despite their liberty.  The idea evolved, which seemed quite intelligent, that a more sensible program would be to isolate candidates that would have higher risk of death.  Something would be needed: outer shell, screening and sterilization, then entry.  There was nothing like this.  No PPE was sterilized that I know of.  There was no domestic production of PPE.  They savagely blocked visitors, but medical staff were allowed to come and go.

Similarly, the general populace were locked down, and workers/grocery shoppers were allowed to move around at will.  If tested positive, they were placed into isolation.  This setup seemed to guarantee everyone would be exposed sooner or later as the disease dispersed.  This is okay in China, to cull the herd as it were, but in the US this is very poor policy.  The lockdown was an inherited idea, that had not been rethought.

Finally vaccines were rapidly developed.  But many are wary of getting one for protection because of side effects, and people dying from anaphylactic shock.  Elders, it was designed to assist were told the reaction might kill them.  Generally it was said the vaccine did not stop the transmission of the disease, and distancing would still be required.  So, the vaccines may provide some peace of mind at work and shopping, but then this group is less likely to have serious consequences from the virus.  In other words they might work out the legal ramifications of vaccines this way, but like with the cold- a real vaccination doesn't really exist that is useful.

TO stop a viral outbreak like this, you have to be vaccinated beforehand so it is not transmitted.  This is hard to do, since nations like China have poor social control, and are secretive.  So as a country, testing to ID viruses and their early containment would seem to be the answer.  Tracing the virus back to its source, is necessary, and the cessation of all travel and goods from there is required.  Clearly, you re better prepositioned for outbreaks elsewhere, by self-production of products by people who are not infected.

Rapid response is needed at first, so a state of national emergency is needed with high compliance.  Response to a lethal disease outbreak is not democratic.  If the disease were very dangerous any deviation from emergency plans would be quite damaging. We saw areas of large population acting autonomously, and detrimentally.

Monday, December 28, 2020

Social Mandate: Vaccination Action


Should you be forced to take a vaccination?

IT might seem controversial, yet some people have no problem saying you just have to take it.  Alan Dershowitz said you have no right to refuse a vaccination shot.  the Equal opportunity Employment Commission said it doesn't violate access to employment for any group therefore an employer could mandate a vaccination prior to letting you into the workforce.

What does taking a vaccination have to do with EOEC?  Using their logic they could make the entire workforce do anything as long as it is across the board.  People should not have to take a vaccination in order to live, because - for one thing- they might die.  It would be immoral to force them to do that.  there are other ways to do this, for example, have them take the quick Covid test, or have them examined to see if they are symptomatic.  This ought to be acceptable since they have not rigorously tested the vaccine, and this approach is not modern anymore- not specialized by sex, age, race, or other attribute such as sensitivity.  I use the word modern, as I have used it all my life- not referring to an era we are supposed to think is over, but rather updated, or up to date.

Saturday, December 26, 2020


Mayor Cooper of Nashville, may have acquiesced to the bombing of the AT&T building.  Individuals are afraid, since the perception exists the federal government may not respond.   IT may have severed links used by Oakridge National Lab (ORNL), as part of an ongoing cyber attack.  ORNL does research into cybersecurity, and uses for nuclear reactions.  China has repeatedly tried to attack the lab since 2007.  Chinese actually applied to work at ORNL(one a graduate of the UW-Madison) , to learn more about proton focusing among other things.  Someone in the media finally said: "Hey, should we be allowing these people to work in our labs?" Iran might also be an actor in this, as a reprisal for the murder of one of their researchers by Israel.  

The border issue is important.  We do not have the resources to chase down groups operating within our country.  There are several concerns, none of which is being addressed: Without travel restrictions there are problems with the spread of disease.  Obviously the idea of leaving everything open was a severe failure.  Secondly there are the uncontained attacks via communication channels that need to be more closely monitored, and shut off to hostile states.  Thirdly, we have agents operating within the country, that may do any amount of damage to us, if they are not intercepted first.  This is very difficult to control with open borders.  WE cannot allow foreign entities to assault us at will if they so choose. Why are our votes being counted outside the country?

How can you stop a terror incident when you have no border control?  If a country like Iran threatens, what response was there?  Maybe listening in on a few telephone lines?

Wednesday, December 23, 2020

Cheap classes!


Everyone is online, attending class over the internet these days.  The question is, suppose someone who interests you has a semester class.  Can you enroll across boundaries of these institutions to get less expensive or more interesting classes, for credit back where you are enrolled?  

To the enduser, Zoom doesn't care where you are, whether it is New York City, or China, although there may be latencies or blocks across some nations.  So say you would like the chance to hear Marilynne Robinson give a series of lectures from the Univ. of Iowa on writing and her books, comparing them with literature that is similar.  Why not get credit?

There are many cases in which classes are not available locally or only available every other year and you need to take it now.  What to do?  If the famous Prof. Swartfinger is offering his class this upcoming semsester, Why can't you take it?  You might find you cannot attend a particular school because they do not offer you all the classes you would like to have, or that you might have to waste a year waiting for a class to be taught.

And what if the professor teaching your class dislikes teaching and he just rips through the material spiritlessly.  For Godsake, why can't I take this class from somewhere else?

P TRump will speak to his citizens


The wave of corruption started in 2006 or so, will gradually play itself out.  But for the moment it is still here among us, and affecting our lives.

P. Trump is expected to show in graphic detail, undeniable proof of fraud in the election overlooked by Justice Roberts.  Much of the fraud  was motivated by P. Obama.  There will be no hope for Biden when people see and know what actually happened.

IF evidence is clearly displayed, that depicts step by step what happened with the voting machines, should fail, and a goony gets in as the corrupt champion president, expect turmoil.  I believe the vast majority elected P. Trump, and they will not support Biden.  Biden has the Chinese as his main supporters and I think the moves made by China ought to call for a suppression of their expansion.  If Biden exhorts them to expand faster, I would expect he would have a fairly serious confrontation on his hands since China is a dangerous, expansionary power.  The rise of the radical Left during his term may dislodge him from office.  This would leave a Latino band in charge, with Muslims, and Africans as the remaining party.  I do not believe anyone will support them, even if they promise to give away $1M to every person.


Doctor Biden


"Hey doc, I'm running a little fever.  Somethin goin around?  Can't say?  Well, like, what kind of doctor are you?"  

And isn't it strange that a person from Northwestern would be the one to complain.  After all, degrees were used as a form a social advancement for downtrodden Commies throughout Northwesternland.  but that is different I suppose, than a Cronie with a presumed doctorate from "his state".  You can use doctor in the first instance because it is a form of ascendancy; without the Doctor entitlement, really what good is giving them a doctorate?  Like Obama's Peace prize.   But in the second instance there is no ascendancy required- a cronie's wife, well is just another cronie.  Some have military medals and various awards, Delaware Conspicuous Service Award, etc. 

The question is is it mysogynistic to call Jill "Doctor"?  Does this not deprive her of  actually learning and researching, of being taken seriously as a woman and accomplishing something?  Once you have it, I mean, isn't it too late?  She would have to be called Doctor Doctor.  Once she is given the crony degree, the educators  have turned her into a demure bimbo for life.

I have seen it all.  The problem is often nepotism.  I have seen a "Doctor" get a degree in six months by using someone elses' work.  I have seen many cases like this- people who really did no thesis.  One guy had a dissertation with a few front pages and a few back pages with nothing in between.  I have seen people without a defense, and some who zeroxed pages out a textbook for their PhDs.  Another problem is race.  Diversity means you can quickly graduate "doctors" in your circle if they have the same race as you.  Let me tell you friend: For those of us who earned our degrees, these people: the nepotists and the diversifiers, are not ever called "Doctor".  We await the day the nepotists are arrested.  And people who cheat to acquire degrees banned from the halls of academia for life. 

Jill is no doctor.

Saturday, December 19, 2020



Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum, in July, raised concerns about a possible cyberattack.  Recall he earlier raised concerns about a pandemic.  He is the spokesperson for Global Corporate control as constituted through what was the United Nations.  The World Economic Forum has basically taken the UN over, and is reconstituting it as corporate control over all nations.  Of course, the UN really had little to say about this, and to a large extent it is baloney.  No one has to listen to the UN as spokespiece for WEC, except the captive media, and certain lackey leaders of countries, some who may have visited Epstein's Island.

Besides having corrupted the US vote, and having created the pandemic, we now have a cyber-crisis being blamed on Russia.  This is so absurd.  

One problem with corporate control, is you have nothing to say about what they do; people like the Soros family, the Rothschilds, the Schwabs, and the bankers.  They are presenting themselves through Schwab as a socialist entity, but he is just their weird leader and figure head of the corporate structure that hands him his pieces of paper to read.  Corporate is Fascist.  They impose, and you have no government that will stand up for your rights and ensure you are safe living in this world.  So, they roll out 5G.  Only P. Trump stood up to them.  They were willing to basically use the general public as guinea pigs when it came to safety of these systems.  Now with vaccines, the fast-tracking of these treatments means the FDA is basically sitting this out, and frontline medical workers are the guinea pigs.  One of the vaccines may alter your genetics permanently, and who will know what effects that will have?  The C19 phenomena is leading to corporate controlled injections, the purpose of which we may have little to say about.  

What benefit would WEC get out of a cyberattack?   Well, they might obtain control over independently operating networks, in the same way they are gaining control over businesses with C19.  they could destroy old electronics used in networks and replace it with Huawei-like components.

Here is Klaus Schwab, talking about cyberattacks as if he is talking from Moonbase:

Thursday, December 17, 2020

Social Fabric is Disintegrating

 I have noticed, regrettably people are feeling more and more unsafe to just go outside.  They are becoming afraid to encounter other people.  Not everyone, of course, but more and more it is so.

What is it?  Well, C19 lockdowns have had an effect on some people's nervous systems.  They have become accustomed to seeing only a few other people.  It is making them feel uneasy and insecure around other people.  Plus they are often wearing masks and you cannot see who they are and their facial expressions.  Are they sick?  Are they dangerous? 

Not just that, but also it is the riots and social tension out there.  People are acting out politically and harming others, often innocent people.  Some people are afraid of having their cars damaged, or being personally assaulted.   They are afraid of talking to other people, or crossing their path.  They are afraid because they think the police may not be protecting people.

Critics of this situation are saying it is like living in a Banana Republic, or Moscow.

How could we let this happen to us?  It appears some adventurous people like Hunter Biden became men of the world, learned foreign vices, and learned repressive tactics from foreign leaders and kind of assimilated them, thinking perhaps they could do the same.  It is not only politicians that we are presumed to have voted into office, it is also business people who operate abroad and  bring the mentality of the people they come to know back home.  We lose our free press, we lose our privacy rights, etc.

All the vices and diseases we rid ourselves of, are being brought back in, and sold to us as a new order.  Obviously we are not influencing the people abroad, but rather the opposite.  And have you had one of those machines follow you in an aisle in Walmart?

Wednesday, December 16, 2020



We are all thinking about ballots, and how to restore the integrity of the vote.  IT requires an imposition of order, apparently.  We all know agitators from California are involved in many of the street crimes and riots.  We know that drugs roll out of there all over the country.  We know the state is occupied with non-English speaking people, many of whom are not assimilated into our country.  Once illegal aliens enter California, they are in.  They pick a little fruit and could go anywhere.  We have had a few waves of transitory Californians here in WI, using accompanied by a crime wave.  People from SanFrancisco, were in the front wave of all the riots in places like Portland, and Chicago.

And that is just the international part, and the homosexual parts.  There are rough groups that roll out of there that could terrorize the entire West: Biker gangs, wild events, and rapper groups.  And the Chinese lovers.

We here in WI would appreciate it if they were required to obtain passports to enter the US.  Really, its no big deal- so why not have them get a little booklet that lets people know if they are leaving, and where they might be going.  Do they enter from Mexico and leave again in a few weeks?  Is something dangerous setting up in Las Vegas?  Are they having sex with children in Arizona, or Nevada?

Minneapolis, you might think, would be more concerning.  But Californians want more than Sharia Law- they want to violate you.  Like did that guy just place something in my drink?  IS he from California?  Almost for sure.

We might want to throw out their vote too, but until God floats it out into the ocean, they' re still a part of the United States.  WE need California in case our children do not right in boot camp.  But they shouldn't be allowed to run for national office.

Tuesday, December 15, 2020

Finally Saying Goodbye to Elaine Chao?


WE recall Wendy, who was rumored to have thrown Rupert Murdoch under a piano.  But then her social saliency receeded.  After serving many years in D.C., and an obvious overture to the Chinese, people have wondered about her relationship with McConnell, his rise to leader in the Senate, and their connections to Mainland China.  Her parents own a shipping business, and ... she was made Transportation Secretary, and was rumored to have direct connections to the Chinese Politburo. 

Mitch has always been a complex fellow.  A supposed Conservative, he also chums with the like of Bill Clinton. Peter Schweiter has claimed China was drawn to this couple and used their influence to cement in the loyalty of the McConnells.  No doubt Mitch is where he is, to prevent any turn against the Chinese trade.  Pretty obvious.  He has a popularity of 10%, and won the election in Kentucky by 57%. 

Chao thus, has always been the Golden Lady of Chinese Shipping, able to write large checks to various causes.  She has never had children, and her appearance has gone through various alterations, like only a wealthy woman can. She is a large lady, described having "Large boats". Wait a minute.  Her hand- the ring finger is shorter than her index finger.  Maybe a sign of royalty?

WE have a President-Unelected

This is probably the worst period in US history since the Civil War.  We have a President-UnElected, a majority of people do not believe has won.  What will happen?  

Who is the masked man? We do not really know who Joe is these days.  He had been a blue collar, union supporter back in the day, and he actually tried to recreate that impression for this election, just as Obama appeared to be a southern Baptist Black.  It is a bit confusing, like trying to figure out how the dull guy who pardoned Nixon got his name, was privileged in his youth, and ascended to high office.

And imagine if JFK had Malcolm X as his VP.  Would Chicago have gone down as it did?  What if JFK's brother made millions selling vodka in the US, made in the USSR?  You would have even more reason to oppose him, I suppose.  He would have been a dogshit president from the getgo, and that is who Biden is.  We are to believe despite what our eyes see and our minds know, that he was the popular choice.  Like he said, "You will support me, right? We are all together in this, okay?".

  I mean otherwise there are huge brewing problems.  Like, I mean, insurrection of the second kind.  If Harris is thought to be directing policy, LOOK OUT.  There will be a wall of dissent closing in, that nothing will stop - no amount of money, ... or judge, or guard.

  His job, if he decides to accept it, is to capitulate to the Chinese Communists. He is giving up as the best way to go- really without a skirmish.  As our restaurants go Chinese, how will that sit with the rest of us?  The Left seized this position through coercion.  No doubt a large portion of the US populace will feel like they have been maced.

Monday, December 14, 2020

Christian Economics


Is it Keynesian, or perhaps Marxist?  Is it Popiary Monetarism?

I do not know the answer.  Surely Christian organizations prior to Tammy Faye Baker existed, and in fact many of our contemporary institutions were founded by churches and Christian missions, without IPOs.  They started universities and hospitals.  Are we missing out on something when we diminish the role of Christianity in economics?

What is Christian Economics? What does this mean? 

 "it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God"

Wealth acquisition obviously is not the Christian goal. Firstly, I would think it is the maintenance or caretaking of Christendom, for we believe this is the truly best way to live.  It has proven itself in the creation of civilization, and civility.  It is inclusive, and unbigoted, and instituted that way by Constantine.  It brought dissimilar people together, and embraced intercommunication.  The Holy Spirit brought tongues to Christ's disciples to spread his word to all nations.    

There is usually a distinct dislike for the effects of bribing that leads to corruption, or in other words less reliance solely on the use of money, and the desire for money:

 1 Tim 6.10 "or the desire of money is the root of all evils; which some coveting have erred from the faith, and have entangled themselves in many sorrows."

It is interesting that Crusaders departed for the Holyland without provisions but acquired them from villagers on their path, as charitable offerings.  How many would do this to support air forces that bombed Iraq, I wonder?

Then there is the issue of Usury, or as some people call it: the time value of money.  However, money might increase or decrease in value over time, but interest is always a burden to the taker of a loan.  For transactions that are not monetary or without interest, time is handled some other way, or not at all.

Capitalism, as captures of societies by financial interests and certain ethnic groups, has run its course, and has lost popularity.  There are now a few very rich capitalists and many who dislike them.  Their control is crude, and calamitous.  Christianity on the other hand is a form of growth and conversion- they built cities and dedicated them to God.  We have reduced our participation in faith to a ritual, and perhaps what we ought to be doing, is using our faith to change the world around us, as was done earlier.  Your faith is a way to live, not just something you do in a building.  It is not just social rules for children, it is a way for participants to associate and live- to support your family.  They rid societies of sacrifices, cannibalism, slavery, and gangsterism.  They imposed an order: this is good and that not as good, that is bad and should be outlawed.  Certain things should not be seen, other things should not be heard.  Christians policed themselves. They created a spark- through order they made life tolerable, less fearful, and comfortable enough to make people want to live and improve their lives. They too, can adapt to current conditions to rid us of our contemporary maladies which are multiplying every day in the City of Man.  There could be a New Advent.


Sunday, December 13, 2020

The Beauty of Proper Democracy


The leader selected by an exercise of the will of the people, is the beauty of the democratic system. If it's an August moment, as people pace through lines to register eventually their vote, then to go to a place where they await the accumulated tally.  You are there, like your parents, and their parents before them. Destiny awaits.  God watches.

Such a system is beautiful, but it is not the system we have. We look around us to see where we have failed. .We are mired in confusion, misdirected by lies, having our will shunted aside by the unpatriotic . Will the cheaters lead us? How will we inaugurate our rightful leader? We grope in the dark .The Lawless have spiked the system, and likely have been for some time.  How could these people be democratic? 

Saturday, December 12, 2020

No Standing?


The Supreme Court would not hear the case brought by the White House of voting irregularities in some states, brought forth by the state of Texas, saying they had no standing.  It was the Supreme Court that apparently had the inability to stand with the suit, fearing repercussions.  They needed to go against standard practice and address the standing Texas has- but did not.  As a result there is an unclosed rift between these states.

On its face the state of Texas and any state, is interdependent with other states when it comes to electing a president.  If several states cheat in the election affecting the result and if this has a harmful consequence to their state, then ... obviously there is standing.   In Texas, the border is a major issue, and cheating in these other states directly affects them.  They have seen the irregularities plainly, and surely they cannot be easily forgotten.  This swindle of votes is an unforgiveable crime.

What is to stop future cheating in tallying the vote?  This is the mechanism required, exactly.  Instead we have the high court, going along with those who have turned their backs on law enforcement, who ignore the people who corrupted the vote.  One after another like a mantra they have turned against righting the vote.  just like we were to socially distance, and accept Joe as the early president-elect.  

Wednesday, December 9, 2020



We are suffering from a disease.  But to all appearances the problem is not COVID, but what created and nurtured COVID.  Now, the NIH and CDC are about to launch a vaccine and possibly trying to force everyone to take it- that may be lethal to some, and causes severe reactions in many.  This is a bit frightening, that it is forced and possibly worse than the disease for which it is intended to assist you.  All this time they did not address the test issues - all the false positives - and this is all a symptom of corruption in government.  We cannot rely on them to do what is right - more likely they will go along with some hoax or another.  They are no longer our government but more so becoming a danger to us.  They are no longer there to protect our rights, but to try and take advantage of their position for themselves.  To engage them is harmful to yourself.  That is the real disease.

IT  has hit the DOJ, and the FBI.  Now it has scrambled the electory system, stealing away the public voice through spike voting.  This is no longer a government of, for, and by the people.  What has Congress done to correct anything?  Very little.  They are the causes of most of these problems: the dysfunction of government branches, the intrusion of illegal aliens, unchecked corporate initiatives, support for hoaxes: climate, the Russian election hoax, etc.  Most of this action is behind the scenes and goes unreported.  Congress is a club, and most of us are not members.  After all the smoke is cleared, they are always configured just the same, doing the same things.  Now there is the augury that a fixed group will be there, and nothing can change that.

For now and into the foreseeable future we might have to take those injections.  There may be more insults to you, your life, property, and outlook for the future.   Meanwhile some of the lawless people out there think the US economy is great, and that people can all live in the public domain off a government check without having to work.  Ya, sure.  Without Yankee ingenuity and muscle, they are just going to slowly collapse into an ever narrowing chasm of disregard.  There are few signs this trend is reversible.

Friday, December 4, 2020

To COVID or Not to COVID

That is the question. AS we sit in Elsinore, we contemplate our fate, one way or the other. WE realise it is largely a ruse, partly to support people who are our enemies, but still part of this is acceptable. We might reject socialism, for we do not wish to lose our individual rights, but we might like to see revisions in sectors of our economy that required revision. IT is a mixed bag, but the lockdown is unacceptable as a means toward any end. And I for one, have no desire to trade off my rights for anything.

 So when the messenger comes and says support COVID, for that is what we want- what can we say? In our mind's eye we can know- death statistics do not lie. We are seeing people with colds, with the flu, and possibly other maladies and induced conditions being portrayed as COVID. And so to defend this lie, is to invite oneself to be incarcerated to more of this, and loss of rights.

 Before the C19 disease phenomenon, first we had lawlessness on the part of the Democratic Party, Hillary at large, and many unprosecuted cases. For some time this same group promoted illegal voting, including illegals in political organizing and polling. This led to riots and calls to defund the police, just prior to the election assuring the greatest amount of illegal voting action. Covid-19 is largely coincident with this, and just as votes were flipped, various maladies were recategorized as Covid-associated, and deaths were called Covid-19 deaths, but really these deaths we know have been fromo other things: pneumonia, influenza, and colds, among many other things. We know this because actual mortality has not changed- there is no new cause of massive deaths at all. There is this appearance however, just as there is an appearance that Biden won the election. Biden on what he would do if he disagrees with Kamala: "I'll develop some disease and say I have to resign." 🤔 He is telling us the purpose of Covid-19 phenomena is to remove people from their jobs.

 Covid will probably never go away. It is a cold. It will keep coming back. The mechanism for removing people from their jobs with a positive test, will remain into the future unless we stop it. In the same way, if we are to return to legal and accountable voting, we must stop the illegal activities, and remove the climate of illegitimacy that hangs over the Left.

Tuesday, December 1, 2020

Socialism is Rising, and must be Confronted


Socialistic covens continue to operate, regardless of who is elected.  As Kamala Harris declared: "This will go on also after the election, and will not be affected by it."  They are moving toward community based standards, at the expense of individual rights.

I would guess these groups are possibly involved in corrupting the vote, afterwards denying any involvement.  There are three goals at present, maybe more, and they are attempting to carrying these out by placing people into positions that corrupt existing governmental services, and replace them with their own extralegal ones.  Their concerns:

1)  Low income people on public assistance should not be heterosexually married.  There are no laws that say this - what would appear to be a horrible imposition on our basic liberties - but they can be imposed in effect by case workers (Lightfoot: Either that or you could just shoot them).

2) They are working actively to take away ownership rights.  They see a broad channel for activities that impose external standards on an individual's property, essentially rendering them under the control of government operatives.  They could force you to let them use your property for a project that has nothing to do with you.  They could force you to let them gain entry to your land and home for various reasons, leading to them actually controlling access to your house and yard.  The slippage is in state, county and municipal officials, who do not impose municipal codes, or state laws.  Informally they might impose their own way of operating that is extralegal.  They are replacing laws with community standards.   So your property might be owned by you, but your neighbors might tell you what they do not like about how you use the property, and force you to make changes.  They might do this purely for political effect, and force you out of the community.

3)  They are actively engaged in using the health care system as a means to obtain social control.  Today we have COVID-19 treatment, and public health policies to consider.  It is not inconceivable people would be given viruses that are undesirable, or that treatment might be withheld.   This is probably already happening through microdecisions that are made everyday, made by personnel that are placed into those positions for that purpose.