Our government is a system of laws, bound together under the terms delineated in our Constitution. What then, if people decide to ignore segments of the law? Well, it is sedition, isn't it?
This came to the forefront recently with the large abrogation of laws entailed in imposing the Covid-19 vaccine. The law clearly states that vaccines are illegal, if a therapeutic is available. Covid-19 has at least two or three therapeutic regimes, yet they were ignored, the vaccines were made, and are being distributed. The latest on this, is that the RNA vaccines are communicable, and hence even if you do not get the vaccines, the proteins are communicated through contact and breathing, and will induce an immune response even if you did not accept a jab. Designed this way, it is also an extralegal imposition.
The first instance of seriously unattended laws had been Hillary Clinton's illegal use of her server, and the mishandling of classified information. Using a private system to avoid federal tracking of all your social interactions is a natural tendency, especially when a new system is started up like EMAIL. Hopefully this is no longer the case - does anyone know what people are doing these days? Hopefully it is not a free-for-all. BUT this in combination with the mishandling of classified information, is clearly seditious. Not only that but Hillary herself has practically stated it was her personal political choices that were involved in this. They are unashamed anti-nationalists. So are people like Fauci. This is national sedition.
Living in the country, I am concerned. If I stick my neck out for the country, will someone like Hillary expose me, and subject me to harm? Maybe not today, but perhaps tomorrow. Likewise, if my body is exposed to proteins/viruses from outside the country, will there be anyone to protect me? Will it be extralegals from outside the country that will impose their solution for my health on me? Will I be protected? Could they kill me?
As is customary, if DC does it, sooner or later their practices percolate down into the state houses, and eventually into all city halls. They begin to ignore bodies of law they find inconvenient, and different political parties choose different bodies of law to ignore. Often both parties ignore the same law for different reasons. Take for example border enforcement. Republicans want cheap labor supposedly, plus Democrats want illegal voters, equals no border enforcement. Obviously as people overrun the border areas, including untold numbers of unwanted children, more must be involved than their stated reasons. With many state laws, Republicans say they do not want overregulation. This means companies pay them off, and they ignore imposing these laws on the companies. At the same time John Q Public is ransacked by nonrestrictions on corporations. People are losing their basic rights and protections under the law.
As a citizen you know the law is there to protect you, and you might oppose a corporation for that reason. In court however, you might find a SURPRISE. The law requiring a corporation to do A and B, might simply disappear from the judges decision making, and voila - your protect is gone. Lawyers, state officials, and elected reps know what is enforced and what is not. BUT you, as a citizen, do not know. How can you choose your actions if you do not know what laws are to be applied? The corporations, however, may be able to decide to do anything, including pushing people around and breaking laws liberally, just to clean up their mess by paying off a politician. Besides corporations getting away with murder, Marxists are using the climate to create committees that are deciding policy, independent of all laws. Some are judges. Watch out! Those committee members may not be elected people. This is calamity. There are no respected rights for the general populace in this mode of operation.